To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Vloggercon venue voting now on the wiki
I have to say that I agree with Jen.
I'm very willing to participate, but I'm not willing to put it together,
so
my vote doesn't really mean a lot, in that I vote to have it where it
will
happen
As if I didn't have better things to do than think up ways to decide
a venue for a convention I won't be able to attend, I just found
myself going through all the emails about Vloggercon from the last 6
months and noting down everyone's preferences.
If you've said that you're For a city,
Hello,
Is anyone else getting So hungry... message on that page. The one
followed by...
Hic!... Oops! It looks like PBwiki has the hiccups This
message is usually an indication that our servers aren't responding
fast enough. Your wiki data is safe and we'll be back to normal as
soon as
I think what will matter is not the number of people who 'vote' for a
city, but the reality of whether / not it will work there //
especially regarding who will host and produce the event. My vote is
that the people actually doing the work (presumably without getting
paid, as was the case
We've heard from Boston and DC that they're willing to do it...
If there's a number of people who want it to happen in a place, the
organisers will step forward.
I think it needs to be a group led decision, not just a practical
organiser based one.
On 25 Apr 2007, at 22:41, Jen Simmons
