i don't trust anyone over 30...
i will soon not trust myself...
On Dec 28, 2007 4:53 AM, Patrick Delongchamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am always wary of people that distrust Wikipedia as it reveals a lot.
I am always wary of people that distrust Wikipedia as it reveals a lot.
It might simply reveal that they actually fact-checked more than one article
and found Wikipedia to be packed with inaccuracies. In some cases,
attempting to participate in Wikipedia and correct those accuracies is shut
down
Perhaps I should have said people that distrust the Wikipedia model.
Fact checking is definitely your responsibility as well as an
important part of anything you read online. The threshold for
inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability which makes this much easier.
Any statements that are not
And just to bring things back to the topic at hand. This is exactly
the kind of nit picking of emails that I feel has brought the group
down. Where was the comment on everything else I brought up? This
kind of stuff only starts flame wars.
On Dec 28, 2007 12:21 PM, Jake Ludington [EMAIL
And just to bring things back to the topic at hand. This is exactly
the kind of nit picking of emails that I feel has brought the group
down. Where was the comment on everything else I brought up? This
kind of stuff only starts flame wars.
I was validating your point by not commenting on
lol, well said.
On Dec 28, 2007 3:39 PM, Jake Ludington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And just to bring things back to the topic at hand. This is exactly
the kind of nit picking of emails that I feel has brought the group
down. Where was the comment on everything else I brought up? This
Patrick Delongchamp wrote:
It's important to understand something before discrediting it.
However, if this is of no interest to you I can recommend others that
universally hold the same opinions of Wikipedia as your own. They
are:
- creationists
- people who easily buy into conspiracy
Andrew man, do you really have to lay a long ass email like that on me?
Give a vidbro a break, wouldya? It's still the holidays for some people.
Damn, now I gotta formulate answers
You make a lot of assumptions about us and my role at PodTech, Let me just
lay the ground work a bit so you have
I realize that this topic is dying so I thought, what better time to
jump in? I have to say that, Robert, I agree with a lot of what you,
Andrew, Schlomo, etc have said over the last week.
If it's of any consolation, there's something I realized when dealing
with the Wikipedia issue: When
Sorry, Correction. Irina tells me she was working for Top Ten Sources and
Dealmaker Media when she started talking with Furrier about coming to
PodTech. Sorry for making that factual error.
Robert Scoble
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Just a side track I guess on what may be a rhetorical question but a
question nonetheless:
On Dec 26, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Eddie Codel wrote:
How many
people do you think it takes to put out a daily Rocketboom episode?
In context of your show on Podtech, along with the very nice budget
that
Gena,
Thanks, this was a very nice Christmas present and a nice way to end a
really great day. Someone just forwarded me your email and I appreciate that
too.
I haven't been able to respond over on the Cheryl page because it keeps
saying my comments are spam, which is funny too. Oh well.
Robert,
I'm really sorry that your first venture out of Microsoft didn't turn out to
be an overwhelming success. It wasn't entirely your fault, as things like
this go. But I am afraid you're trying to hang your baggage about this
failure (and I think failure is a good thing) on this community.
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jeffrey Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2007 11:43 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com; Robert Scoble
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] My Amends To Robert Scoble
Robert,
I'm really sorry that your first venture out of Microsoft didn't turn
14 matches
Mail list logo
