One line occurs to me as I read through all these.
VIDEO WANTS TO BE SOCIAL.
I'd challenge the Miro people to make it more SOCIAL of an experience.
I think the move AWAY from the permalink button back to the website,
and toward obtuse interactive favoriting system is what causes Miro to
be so
On 9/29/07, Sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
desktop aggregators are cold.
Is that a reference to hot/cold media.
Videoblogging is certainly a hot medium.
An activator.
It is an interesting way to look at it. Because videoblogging does
seem to be at odds with desktop aggregators, set top boxes,
The first question to ask for any product including applications is
does the customer want it? Not, should the customer want it.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
desktop aggregators are cold.
On 9/28/07, Patrick Race [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick Race wrote:
Does anyone here use Miro as a core application and if so was it a conscious
effort to adopt it or did it just slowly become a program you use?
Before my 60GB hard drive filled up due to a lack of recordable CDs, I liked
the lean back experience of watching a half-hour
I love the idea behind Miro and I'm very supportive of the project but I'm
like Bill. I test to see that my feeds work every week or two and don't use
it as a core application. It just hasn't become one of those natural
transitions in my computer use pattern and I think it's probably because a
desktop aggregators are cold.
On 9/28/07, Patrick Race [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I love the idea behind Miro and I'm very supportive of the project but
I'm
like Bill. I test to see that my feeds work every week or two and don't
use
it as a core application. It just hasn't become one of
