Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
Flash player does not ship with browsers, at least not with every
browser, but this doesn't prevent Flash from being widely used.
Initially, the Flash Player plug-in was not bundled with popular web
browsers and users had to visit Macromedia website to download
Hello,On 10/31/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexey Feldgendler wrote: Flash player does not ship with browsers, at least not with every browser, but this doesn't prevent Flash from being widely used. Initially, the Flash Player plug-in was not bundled with popular web
browsers and
* Ian Hickson wrote:
Sure. FWIW, there's a lot of interest in browser vendors about introducing
a video element or some such (or maybe making browsers natively support
video in object, or both).
And there I thought video had already been introduced in 1998.
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[EMAIL
On Oct 31, 2006, at 01:03, Øistein E. Andersen wrote:
On 23 Oct 2006, at 12:43PM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
Using custom schemas with the HTML parser is for experts only
and produces very wrong results unless the schema is suitable.
Indeed so, but then any tool can potentially be misused.
Still,
Le 30 oct. 2006 à 15:33, Ian Hickson a écrit :
* note and reference for footnotes, endnotes, and sidenotes (not
aside in “HTML5”)
Yes, this is an area where document and converter authors
currently need
to come up with their own class-based hacks. Ideally a continuous
media
user agent
I think if HTML5 deprecate the use of dl for dialog, that it ought
to provide a an alternative syntax for them. I know it has already
been discussed, but I'd suggest this:
dialog
pciteMe:/cite qCan I say something?/q
pciteHim:/cite qNo!/q
/dialog
In this design, dialog is
Ian Hickson wrote:
* note and reference for footnotes, endnotes, and sidenotes (not
aside in “HTML5”)
If anyone has any ideas on this, please post them to the list. (The
CSS group is also looking at footnotes closely.)
It would useful to look at previous work and discussion on this issue.
On Oct 31, 2006, at 07:43, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Perhaps, to go along with the Audio() interface, we could have a
Video() interface as well. Maybe it would be wise to introduce a
MultiMedia() interface, which is then inherited by both the Audio()
and Video() interfaces and extended by each
On Oct 31, 2006, at 9:30 AM, James Graham wrote:I think and distinction between footnotes, sidenotes and endnotes is basically presentational and whilst we should try to ensure that markup+CSS can create all three appearances we shouldn't treat them distinctly. Footnotes and endnotes are identical
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:43:37 +0600, Michel Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I'd favor term and time instead, or anything else
that conveys a meaning. That's especially important since these
element will have, most of the time, no noticeable effect on the
visual representation of
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:30:44 +0600, James Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pSome text span class=sidenotethis is a sidenote to put
in the margin/span and some other text./p
This seems to have a poor backward compatibility story - in a non-supporting
UA the note ends up in the flow.
It requires no changes to JavaScript and a small, incremental change to
HTML.
The proposal is here: http://json.org/module.html
What you propose looks very similar to the Cross-document messaging already
included into the current draft:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:54:12 +0600, David Walbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know how blind users prefer footnotes to be read for
them?
I would never want to require that a footnote be read to anyone,
thereby interrupting the text -- it is in the nature of a footnote to
be
...
To get valid markup I must use a table tags if I want my layout to
*function* that way. There is no way to fake it. It took three minutes
to change the tags to table tags and the page functions perfectly now.
This is for the benefit of the users.
Some case of non sequitur, imho.
I am in
Hello,On 10/31/06, Rimantas Liubertas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... To get valid markup I must use a table tags if I want my layout to *function* that way. There is no way to fake it. It took three minutes to change the tags to table tags and the page functions perfectly now.
This is for the
Also sprach David Walbert:
On Oct 31, 2006, at 9:30 AM, James Graham wrote:
I think and distinction between footnotes, sidenotes and endnotes
is basically presentational and whilst we should try to ensure that
markup+CSS can create all three appearances we shouldn't treat them
Anders,
As you said, we may not get sufficient informations to standardize
digital signature. But, in case of Korea, I'll sufficiently give them.
The spec. and interface are almost standardized by governmental rules
to all vendors.
In Korea, the own cryptic algorithm has been encouraged, so
On 10/31/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On 10/31/06, Rimantas Liubertas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
To get valid markup I must use a table tags if I want my layout to
*function* that way. There is no way to fake it. It took three minutes
to change the tags
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:53:04 +0600, Håkon Wium Lie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I agree. W3C recently published a proposal on how to achieve
footnote/endnote presentations using the same markup [1]. The proposal
is quite simple. Given this markup:
div class=note../div
you would achieve
Michel Fortin wrote:
Le 30 oct. 2006 à 15:33, Ian Hickson a écrit :
One thing to consider when
looking at footnotes is would the title= attribute handle this use
case
as well as what I'm proposing?. If the answer is yes, or almost,
then
it's probably not a good idea to introduce the new
That's a personal opinion, but I think it may have some value.
I find the proposed x and t elements to lack expressiveness in
their names. I understand that making them shorter is desirable, but
it also has a drawback: they're harder to understand simply by
looking at the source and their
On 10/29/06, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Ban tables for layout.
As long as graphic designers want to use grid-based layouts, telling
them to fake them with floats or, worse, positioning is jumping from
the frying pan into the fire. (And telling them to use display:
table;
You need to define precisely what happens in the context of the receiver
when it handles a message. Does script processing suspend for that time?
Or does it run in parallel to handling the message?
The sender is suspended until the receiver returns.
On Oct 31, 2006, at 15:34, Michel Fortin wrote:
I think if HTML5 deprecate the use of dl for dialog, that it
ought to provide a an alternative syntax for them.
I still think dl makes sense for plays and the dialog doesn't need
to be represented on the markup level when punctuation would
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Douglas Crockford wrote:
You need to define precisely what happens in the context of the
receiver when it handles a message. Does script processing suspend for
that time? Or does it run in parallel to handling the message?
The sender is suspended until the receiver
Matthew Raymond wrote:
Here's a thought:
| p
| grouplabel for=genderGender:/grouplabel
|labelinput type=radio name=gender value=mMale/label
|labelinput type=radio name=gender value=fFemale/label
| /p
The element grouplabel gives the label for the group.
That's similar to the
I came across an article by Jesper Tverskov titled The benefits of footnotes in
webpages.
(http://www.smackthemouse.com/footnotes) It may be of interest.
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail
Sander Tekelenburg wrote:
At 20:35 -0800 UTC, on 2006-10-31, Jonathan Worent wrote:
I came across an article by Jesper Tverskov titled The benefits of
footnotes in webpages.
(http://www.smackthemouse.com/footnotes) It may be of interest.
IMO the problems with the title attribute he lists are
On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:24:08 +0600, Channy Yun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said in other thread, I think digital signature must be
standardized for secure and legal assurance of form data and I respect
your issuing and great jobs. But, we can simply think this issue in
range of this group.
On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 03:01:29 +0600, Douglas Crockford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to define precisely what happens in the context of the receiver
when it handles a message. Does script processing suspend for that time?
Or does it run in parallel to handling the message?
The sender is
Michel Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2006-10-31 09:43 -0500:
I find the proposed x and t elements to lack expressiveness in
their names. I understand that making them shorter is desirable, but
it also has a drawback: they're harder to understand simply by
looking at the source and their
31 matches
Mail list logo
