On Nov 2, 2006, at 3:44 PM, Jonathan Worent wrote:
--- Christoph Päper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First off I think the requirement for a |title| is too strict,
because there are time and space saving abbreviations everyone knows
-- i.e. either their expansion or their meaning -- that do not
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Abbreviation expansions should only be supplied when they help the
reader to understand the content, not just because the word happens to
be an abbreviation.
I agree, unless using abbr with no title is useful to get the correct
rendering of abbreviations in non-visual
James Graham wrote:
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Abbreviation expansions should only be supplied when they help the
reader to understand the content, not just because the word happens to
be an abbreviation.
I agree, unless using abbr with no title is useful to get the correct
rendering of
I can see what everyones reasoning for not requiring the title (I change my
vote :)
--- Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Graham wrote:
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Abbreviation expansions should only be supplied when they help the
reader to understand the content, not just because
--- Christoph Päper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First off I think the requirement for a |title| is too strict,
because there are time and space saving abbreviations everyone knows
-- i.e. either their expansion or their meaning -- that do not need
an expansion, e.g. e.g. or AIDS.
Le 1 nov. 2006 à 21:44, Jonathan Worent a écrit :
I disagree. There is never a guarantee that people will know what
an abbreviation stands for, I know what AIDS is but not what it
stands for. Also accessing the title information is optional. If
the user knows what the abbreviation stands
