Re: [Wicket-user] Link#setEnabled( false ) does not disable button element

2006-12-13 Thread Erik van Oosten
Hi Paolo, attempt-to-precise-semantics Actually, everything is uniform at this moment. The contract for Component#setEnabled says: * Sets whether this component is enabled. Specific components may decide to * implement special behavior that uses this property, like web form *

Re: [Wicket-user] Link#setEnabled( false ) does not disable button element

2006-12-13 Thread Erik van Oosten
True. To make it rock solid, I think it should be adaptable and/or extendable. IMHO it is not fair to expect that the change you propose is done perfectly from the start and maybe not even ever. If you go for slightly less rock solid, one can write code for every component known in the html

Re: AW: [Wicket-user] Link#setEnabled( false ) does not disable button element

2006-12-13 Thread Erik van Oosten
: Mittwoch, 13. Dezember 2006 08:33 An: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] Link#setEnabled( false ) does not disable button element I disagree about that. Methods semantics for components should be uniform, this is the most important rule for API simplicity and coherence

Re: [Wicket-user] Link#setEnabled( false ) does not disable button element

2006-12-13 Thread Eelco Hillenius
On 12/13/06, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: True. To make it rock solid, I think it should be adaptable and/or extendable. IMHO it is not fair to expect that the change you propose is done perfectly from the start and maybe not even ever. Oh, common', what fun is playing fair? ;)

AW: AW: [Wicket-user] Link#setEnabled( false ) does not disable button element

2006-12-13 Thread Korbinian Bachl
: Paolo Di Tommaso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Dezember 2006 08:33 An: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] Link#setEnabled( false ) does not disable button element I disagree about that. Methods semantics for components should be uniform