Hi, I need some request attributes in my page. Those attributes aren't for
session but only for the current request.
To do that I made my own WebRequest that extends ServletWebRequest and
changed the
protected WebRequest newWebRequest(HttpServletRequest servletRequest)
of my application to use
Hi Luca,
Wicket uses the locale for finding resources (including the templates). You
could do without but I am afraid it goes too far to let Wicket do something
about Cocoon's incomplete HttpServletRequest implementation.
So these are the options I see:
1. Make Cocoon behave itself by
Fortunately, there are a couple of cocoon members hiding here
(Sylvain, Jean-Baptiste, Upayavira) so there is a faint possibility
that this can be addressed.
In the mean time, I think you could override getLocale in your custom
session, at least that was possible.
Martijn
On 5/28/07, Erik van
I come from a Spring MVC background. Spring MVC provides the
spring:bind tag which basically allows to throw a pojo at the page
and bind its properties.
Is something similar possible with Wicket, without having to
explicitly bind every property in the page class?
--
Cheers,
Kees de Kooter
that will not work because the locale isn't get through the
Session.getLocale() at that time.
it is set in the session for the first time in 1.3 its in the constructor:
protected Session(Application application, Request request)
{
this.locale = request.getLocale();
but i guess in
what you want is an CompoundPropertyModel:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von Kees de Kooter
Gesendet: Montag, 28. Mai 2007 13:15
An:
I have read about this. Unfortunately all the examples I found are
with forms. I just want to display pojo values on a read only page.
In the examples every property is still coded in the page class (e.g.
in the page you refer to personForm.add(personModel.bind(new
RequiredTextField(city),
well, if you just want to display, then you could use PropertyListView for a
List containing your model-objects:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/listview-and-other-repeaters.html
this is also based on CompoundPropertyModel you even can just have a
Label(foo) getting the getFoo() from a model
Hello,
ive come to a problem I dont know how to solve. I use a BasePage in wich i
have 2 RepeatingViews in wich i then put components (dynamic way at runtime
- i dont know what component will be in)
div wicket:id=header
wicket:header container
/div
div wicket:id=content
Thanks, Alexey and Kent, for your feed-back. Unfortunately, I still have do
add a lot of components to the Page instance, for each line one.
Tom
Kent Tong wrote:
Thomas Singer wicket at regnis.de writes:
Generally, I want to keep the text (including the links to other pages in
it) in the
I've got a small snag with images inside an ajaxlink:
My template looks like this:
a wicket:id=previous class=marginRight href=#
title=Bakaring;timg alt= class=middle
src=img/button_goBack.gif/a
The generated output when the page loads for the first time:
a href=# title=Bakaring;t
Haven't done this, but I think you would need to override renderChild
to get access to the component and setRenderBodyOnly.
best,
jim
On 5/28/07, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
ive come to a problem I dont know how to solve. I use a BasePage in wich i
have 2 RepeatingViews
make a jira issue for this (if not already there) on the apache side
(wicket
sourceforge bug list got a bit lost)
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET
Ok, here it is ;)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-596
If you supply patches it'll be fixed more quickly in
Hm, can't you iterate over your collection of features and add the
corresponding component in each iteration? Something like that?
Thomas Singer-3 wrote:
Thanks, Alexey and Kent, for your feed-back. Unfortunately, I still have
do
add a lot of components to the Page instance, for each
Well, I guess I could use a Fragment (if it would work inside a Border)
inside a RepeatingView, but then I would need to have all feature texts in
the Java code, which is not nice but would work.
Tom
Herman Bovens wrote:
Hm, can't you iterate over your collection of features and add the
Hi,
how to make a bookmarkable link in wicket to render as
a href=# .../a ?
I actually want to put a specific javascript in onclick(),
that should work without reloading a page.
Thanks in advance,
Alexey.
-
This SF.net
How do you determine if a feature is available or not? How do you know
which feature you are currently processing? Are the features coming
from a database/cms backend?
If so, then why isn't the description available? Is that something you
plan on adding in the future?
Why does the page need to
You'd have to write a panel that iterates over the properties of an
object using introspection. It's not difficult to write, but there is
no standard component for this as of yet. Such a panel would contain a
list view with a model that extracts the properties of an object and
returns them as a
2007/5/27, Kent Tong [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Matthieu Casanova chocolat.mou at gmail.com writes:
html
body
span wicket:id=list
label wicket:id=keykey/label
span wicket:id=list2
label wicket:id=valueValue/label
/span
/span
/body
/html
If you use a fragment inside
What about using:
wicket:container wicket:id=header
Eelco
On 5/28/07, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
ive come to a problem I dont know how to solve. I use a BasePage in wich i
have 2 RepeatingViews in wich i then put components (dynamic way at runtime
- i dont know what
What you do should work, or you could just get the request object from
the Wicket request and cast it down to HttpServletRequest.
Why do you need to set request attributes? Are you integrating with
another technology, like JSPs?
Eelco
On 5/28/07, Matthieu Casanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi, no, I'm not integrating with another technology. My problem is that for
each request, I get some informations from a server, and I need those
informations in several components to build my page. Those informations
cannot be stored in session because they change at every request, and it is
What's the best way for a transparent login?
Example: When the user opens a mounted page and he is not logged in, a login
page will be shown and after a successful login redirected to the originally
requested page.
Tom
-
If you can use PageParameters it would be neat (provide your Page's
constructor with it). Otherwise, you'll have to use Eelco's method and
query the request attributes.
Martijn
On 5/28/07, Matthieu Casanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, no, I'm not integrating with another technology. My problem
I'm not sure that exist a better way to do anything in software but a
better way for specific problem and people. For me, in a spring wicket
web application, the better way to implement trasparent login aka
autentication and autorization concern is using acegi framework. Luca
2007/5/28, Thomas
The typical Wicket Way (tm) of doing this is using the
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException [1]
The wicket-auth-roles project and the new wicket-security projects
hosted at WicketStuff also use it to guard authorized pages.
Using a framework as Acegi limits you to URL based
I don't think I can use PageParameters, my datas do not come from the client
but from a server (the web server is connected to a server that provides
it's data).
Matthieu
2007/5/28, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you can use PageParameters it would be neat (provide your Page's
Should I store page parameters in the session myself before throwing the
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException in the page's constructor? How do I
know to what page I should redirect after logging in?
Tom
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
The typical Wicket Way (tm) of doing this is using the
Never mind. RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException-handling is more
lightweight than I assumed. Of course the other processing is completely up
to me.
Tom
Thomas Singer wrote:
Should I store page parameters in the session myself before throwing the
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException
Never mind. RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException-handling is more
lightweight than I assumed. Of course the other processing is completely up
to me.
Tom
Thomas Singer wrote:
Should I store page parameters in the session myself before throwing the
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException in
Hi Eelco,
tried it, but this seems to go more buggy than before:
if I use
wicket:container wicket:id=header
he complains about no end-tag, if i do
wicket:container wicket:id=header / he renders, but puts out:
panelcontent
/wicket:container
(yes , he doesnt print out the
Jim,
thanks for your post - unfortunately i dont understand what you mean
exactly: where should I overrrode renderChild and put what for? - the
trouble for me is the base-tag of the RepeatingView, not the outputs of any
of its childs...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL
* Luca Marrocco:
Our application is essentially based over cocoon (2.1.9) using a
custom framework (around cform and flowscript, you anyone
know was it) for controller development and client side
interface. During this day we have interested to substitute
cform (that is
Hi Korbinian,
Well, the fundamental idea of ListView / RepeatingView is that the
component has no markup of its own. The markup is given to the
children. As such, setRenderBodyOnly on a RepeatingView does nothing.
ListView provides populateItem, so you call setRenderBodyOnly on the
item there.
Hi Jim,
so if I understnad right then you mean the
protected final void onRender(final MarkupStream markupStream)
{
final int markupStart = markupStream.getCurrentIndex();
Iterator it = renderIterator();
if (it.hasNext())
Hm, by default, I'm getting an error that my page is not serializable. But
when I set
application.getDebugSettings().setSerializeSessionAttributes(false);
it works without problems. Could this become a problem when my page still is
not serializable?
Tom
Thomas Singer wrote:
Never mind.
Not there, no. I mean, it is final, so it wouldn't work anyway. Just
renderChild. Or even more direct, for each child you add to
repeatingview, just call setRenderBodyOnly. Then you will see what I
mean. Overriding renderChild was only meant to save you some code :).
On 5/28/07, Korbinian Bachl
Ahh! - great! Thanks very much, it now works as expected!
I mean, it is final, so it wouldn't work
anyway.
we both now you can hack around things like that ;)
Overriding renderChild was only
meant to save you some code :)
as i already did a void addToHeader(Component c)
it was only 1
On account of the serialization, yes this will become a problem for
your backbutton support.
wicket tries to serialize every page to disk and later retrieve it
when a user used the browsers backbutton and then performs an action
where it is necessary to go back to the server.
On account of the
P.S you can read more here
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Wicket-Security
Maurice
On 5/28/07, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On account of the serialization, yes this will become a problem for
your backbutton support.
wicket tries to serialize every page to disk
On account of the transparent login, like Martijn said if you use a
framework for your security it is already handled automagically for
you. Now i am a bit biased on the new wicket-security framework since
i wrote it :), but you should really check it out sometime.
To be exact, we don't need
Regarding the backbutton, When you press the backbutton on you're
browser, it is the browser who gets the previous page from cache, the
server is never notified of this.
So regarding wicket, no there is not much you can do on that end. But
you might be able with the help of some javascript to
Is there a way to hook every AJAX request and add a component (that's on
every page) to the request target? It seems like there might be because of
the way request targets work, but I don't have any idea what the details of
that might look like...
--
View this message in context:
On account of the serialization, yes this will become a problem for
your backbutton support.
wicket tries to serialize every page to disk and later retrieve it
when a user used the browsers backbutton and then performs an action
where it is necessary to go back to the server.
Hmm, looks
On account of the serialization, yes this will become a problem for
your backbutton support.
wicket tries to serialize every page to disk and later retrieve it
when a user used the browsers backbutton and then performs an action
where it is necessary to go back to the server.
One note here
Regarding the back-button: it would be the best if the intermediate license
agreement page would not occur when pressing the back-button, but instead
the previous page (if any). Is something like that possible?
What you need to achieve is that the URL stays stable. One way to
achieve this is
Is there some possibility to avoid the serialization?
Yes, at least theoretically there is by messing with page maps. It's
actually really easy in Wicket 1.3 where you can provide a custom
session store that never relies on serialization.
We have a couple of
classes which have final fields
* Matthieu Casanova:
I don't think I can use PageParameters, my datas do not come from the client
but from a server (the web server is connected to a server that provides
it's data).
You should consider PageParameters as just a concept in the API.
To produce your own PageParameters from the
Hello Eelco,
Op vrijdag 25-05-2007 om 23:12 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Eelco
Hillenius:
in your application's init method
my application doesn't exist yet, I'm just trying to build the
examples.
(or update to the latest Wicket snapshot)? If the problem stays, it
should give you a
Today I pulled wicket-1.3-SNAPSHOT from svn and built it. When I disable
the tests, the build is OK, but with tests enabled many other errors
showed up than the one I asked about in my original post. (I don't think
I have to post them here, as anyone should be able to reproduce this?!)
Should
I have moved up to 1.2.6 of wicket extensions (to match my wicket version),
and I am not seeing warnings about gifs being requested now if I hover
fast over nodes.
Does anyone have any ideas regarding the post below ie
1 - how to make a TreeTable with nodes not) as links, and,
2 - to display
Thanks Herman. Yes, naturally, I started out with that. I think it's to do
with hierarchies and scopes.
I will try out your advice about my invisible span tag in _this_ post.
Strangely, I found that there was no problem if I added the text field
(waitedForId in my example below) to the radio
Thanks Herman. Yes, naturally, I started out with that. I think it's to do
with hierarchies and scopes.
I will try out your advice about my invisible span tag in _this_ post.
Strangely, I found that there was no problem if I added the text field
(waitedForId in my example below) to the radio
Has anybody got any further thoughts on this?
howzat wrote:
wicket: 1.2.6
wicket-extensions: 1.2.6
A couple of questions re TreeTable
Is it possible to configure a TreeTable so its nodes are not links?
So far, I have only found/tried
tree.setLinkType(null)
without achieving
Suppose I have a WizardStep that depends on the information that the user
entered/selected in a previous step. I will need to build the components
when this WizardStep is activated, which means the previous step has been
completed. This means I can't do it in the constructor because it is
Take a look at:
http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Building_wizard_functionality
There is a very simple and and helpful example on the wicket extensions
examples page too (which seems to be unavailable just now).
Herman Bovens wrote:
Suppose I have a WizardStep that depends on the
Look at NewUserWizard from org.apache.wicket.examples.wizard. All
steps share the same model, which is the user instance that is a
member of the NewUserWizard itself. You can work much in the same
fashion.
Eelco
On 5/28/07, Herman Bovens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose I have a WizardStep
One way is to create a custom request cycle processor (extend
WebRequestCycleProcessor) and e.g. override processEvents and check
what the current request target is (do something when it is an
AjaxRequestTarget).
Eelco
On 5/28/07, Jonathan Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to hook
Can you update and see whether the problem is still there?
Eelco
On 5/28/07, Mats Norén [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a small snag with images inside an ajaxlink:
My template looks like this:
a wicket:id=previous class=marginRight href=#
title=Bakaring;timg alt= class=middle
ah yeah, that's what i was vaguely thinking was the way but not quite
remembering. thanks!
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
One way is to create a custom request cycle processor (extend
WebRequestCycleProcessor) and e.g. override processEvents and check
what the current request target is (do
All,
In wicket 1.2.6, I try to do passwordTextField.setResetPassword(false).
But I found that password field always got reset if model object is blank.
It seems that password field never use preserved rawInput to render:
protected final void onComponentTag(final ComponentTag tag)
{
61 matches
Mail list logo
