The company I'm currently working at is a Struts 1 shop. Like most
companies, they tend to stick with technologies they know even if they are
inferrior. Right now I'm working on a Wicket prototype for them but it is
likely they will stay a Struts shop. Technological inertia is hard to
fight.
Technological inertia is hard to fight
wicket is building momentum required to handle struts' inertia, give it
time. I was going to ask the wicket leads to give us a graph showing
wicket's growth generally especially checking download figures this year
against last year and mailing list
I must dissagree(on the part where you say that wicket are mostly used
in intranet apps), although not a wicket veteran yet(only been doing
wicket for around 1.5 years).
The two projects I've been involved in during this periode has both been
using wicket. Both projects being commercially and
That is because there is little point in putting intranet applications
(or non-public facing applications) on the wiki: nobody can see the
applications or browse them.
/me reminds himself to create a video of some sorts for the application built.
Martijn
On 5/23/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez
Thats why peeps should add a user story if the site are non
browsable(thats the part were you mention a video:).. But yeah I guess
you're right:)
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
That is because there is little point in putting intranet applications
(or non-public facing applications) on the wiki:
Hi all,
I am looking for help presenting wicket to my development team.
1-Has anyone out there had to defend wicket vs. struts and would you
have any resources/links/presentations to pass this way to help in
presenting wicket to our group?
2-Has anyone made any measurements/analysis of the
can't you make 2 prototypes of the same application with your team and then
see how it works?
3-Objectively, I am also looking for what wicket is weak at.
hope you have a magnifying glass with you then because that is ofcourse hard
to find ;)
But most people would say i guess use of
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback. We are contemplating doing some prototyping. I
am currently implementing a small application within the group with
wicket but it is not clear weather we will have the time to do the same
for struts. On the other hand most people in the group have some level
of
Hi Florian,
1- I am surprised you want to compare against Struts. Almost any modern web
framework will kick ass compared to Struts.
2- I know only of one. It is the first article on this page on the wiki:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/articles-about-wicket.html. It has a very
nice comparison
Florian Hehlen wrote:
Hi all,
I am looking for help presenting wicket to my development team.
1-Has anyone out there had to defend wicket vs. struts and would you
have any resources/links/presentations to pass this way to help in
presenting wicket to our group?
2-Has anyone made any
Hi,
the reason we are comparing to Struts is that that's one of the
contender. We are not a web-app shop. We need a general purpose toolkit
for intranet development. But since struts is so popular it's being
pitted against wicket.
Florian
Erik van Oosten wrote:
Hi Florian,
1- I am
Florian Hehlen wrote:
Hi,
the reason we are comparing to Struts is that that's one of the
contender. We are not a web-app shop. We need a general purpose toolkit
for intranet development. But since struts is so popular it's being
pitted against wicket.
The thing I took from Matt's talk
wicket is a very good fit for intranet development.
I think it is mostly used in that kind of webapps.
johan
On 5/22/07, Florian Hehlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
the reason we are comparing to Struts is that that's one of the contender.
We are not a web-app shop. We need a general
1-Has anyone out there had to defend wicket vs. struts and would you
have any resources/links/presentations to pass this way to help in
presenting wicket to our group?
Yeah, a million times now :) Seriously, I think you can find quite a
bit googling (use model 2 vs wicket or something) or
14 matches
Mail list logo
