Isarra, I like the idea of endorsements. Of course the best endorsement to
an extension is to have it installed and actively used in a wiki, and the
more popular the wiki is, the bigger that endorsement can be considered.
Wikiapiary has the building blocks for this in place, since they also track
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014, Legoktm legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
At Wikimania, we had a good conversation and a proposal (that was
basically agreed upon by everyone in the room IIRC!) about creating a
gold standard for extensions, judging them based on their code
quality,
On 21/08/14 13:13, Quim Gil wrote:
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014, Legoktm legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
At Wikimania, we had a good conversation and a proposal (that was
basically agreed upon by everyone in the room IIRC!) about creating a
gold standard for extensions, judging them based
On 21 August 2014 08:58, Isarra Yos zhoris...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/08/14 13:13, Quim Gil wrote:
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014, Legoktm legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com
wrote:
At Wikimania, we had a good conversation and a proposal (that was
basically agreed upon by everyone in the room IIRC!)
Hi,
One thing is clear, Aditya has a thick skin, which sadly still seems to be
a quality required in many open source projects including ours. I wonder of
many old-timers would enjoy the kind of reception he got here after
introducing himself as a GSoC student -- even by people that know well
2014-08-20 14:48 GMT+03:00 Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org:
Hi,
One thing is clear, Aditya has a thick skin, which sadly still seems to be
a quality required in many open source projects including ours.
And will remain so for the foreseeable future.
On Tuesday, August 19, 2014, Strainu
On 20/08/14 11:48, Quim Gil wrote:
For those interested in the process of proposing and accepting internship
projects, here you have a post mortem of this specific case:
On Tuesday, August 19, 2014, Strainu strain...@gmail.com wrote:
This sounds like a serious miscommunication before the
When someone creates a product specifically for a certain group of users
(in this case folks installing extensions) without actually knowing what
is useful to them (never even mind 'important' at this stage), there is
something seriously wrong with that process.
Though I might only be a
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014, Isarra Yos zhoris...@gmail.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','zhoris...@gmail.com'); wrote:
When someone creates a product specifically for a certain group of users
(in this case folks installing extensions) without actually knowing what is
useful to them (never
On 8/20/14, 9:04 AM, Quim Gil wrote:
In order to move forward, we can discuss at different levels:
* At a general level, which should be the priorities for mediawiki.org's
gallery of extensions? This will allow us to define more tasks and projects
for potential developers.
2014-08-18 19:35 GMT+03:00 Brad Jorsch (Anomie) bjor...@wikimedia.org:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Mark A. Hershberger m...@nichework.com
wrote:
Yes. This is a GSoC project that was accepted. Getting the ratings to
mw.o is the final step of that.
On 19 August 2014 07:36, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally I don't think in it's current state/design it is overly suitable
for deployment onto MediaWiki wiki as it will introduce a external factor
on the page load for each visitor, although I haven't looked at the current
Probably the original IRC discussions.
On 19 August 2014 17:22, Merlijn van Deen valhall...@arctus.nl wrote:
On 19 August 2014 07:36, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally I don't think in it's current state/design it is overly
suitable
for deployment onto MediaWiki wiki as it
Hi Aditya
I'm truly sorry you are getting this kind of response, the replies
you've got here seem very mean spirited but please don't take them
personally. I hope it doesn't put you off building stuff on top of
MediaWiki.
I just wanted to say thank you for building this, regardless of
whether it
Hi Jon,
I am grateful to the wikimedia community for providing their responses
about this project so there is nothing to be sorry about. I understand they
have a lot of concerns to maintain the quality of data on the site.
The rating system has been built on top of semantic mediawiki so this can
Is it really necessary for people to openly mock the work of a volunteer
developer on the list? No wonder we have so few volunteer developers.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Legoktm legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 8/18/14, 8:47 AM, Chad wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Brad
Has it already been asked anywhere *whether* to make these ratings
available on mediawiki.org? How useful is it really to know that
Extension:ConfirmEdit scored 3 on some external website, especially
without knowing that that 3 comes from a grand total of 1 person?
Relevant:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Aditya Chaturvedi
aditya.iiita...@gmail.com wrote:
However, to run the system in production first, we need assistance on how
to make these ratings visible on the pages of extension.
Has it already been asked anywhere *whether* to make these ratings
available
On 18/08/14 14:54, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Aditya Chaturvedi
aditya.iiita...@gmail.com wrote:
However, to run the system in production first, we need assistance on how
to make these ratings visible on the pages of extension.
Has it already been asked
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) bjor...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Aditya Chaturvedi
aditya.iiita...@gmail.com wrote:
However, to run the system in production first, we need assistance on how
to make these ratings visible on the pages of
On 8/18/14, 8:47 AM, Chad wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) bjor...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Has it already been asked anywhere *whether* to make these ratings
available on mediawiki.org? How useful is it really to know that
Extension:ConfirmEdit scored 3 on some
Legoktm legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com writes:
On 8/18/14, 8:47 AM, Chad wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) bjor...@wikimedia.org
Has it already been asked anywhere *whether* to make these ratings
available on mediawiki.org?
Yes. This is a GSoC project that was
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Mark A. Hershberger m...@nichework.com
wrote:
Legoktm legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com writes:
On 8/18/14, 8:47 AM, Chad wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
bjor...@wikimedia.org
Has it already been asked anywhere *whether* to make
I agree to the points raised about ratings and what parameters are best
suitable for representing them. However, I believe these are evolutionary
features and can only be improved in an agile manner. The key issue I
believe is to address the cold start problem and for this I suppose that
I was meaning to comment on the overall GSoC proposal before the acceptance
stage and didn't get a chance.
Personally I don't think in it's current state/design it is overly suitable
for deployment onto MediaWiki wiki as it will introduce a external factor
on the page load for each visitor,
Hello everyone,
I am happy to announce that as a part of the GSOC project we have
succeeded in developing a platform to allow user's to rate different
extensions of mediawiki on Wikiapiary
https://wikiapiary.com/wiki/Main_Page and syndicating them back to
MediaWiki.
26 matches
Mail list logo
