Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] For those of you on Cisco code 7.5, supporting Bonjour, etc...

2013-10-11 Thread Mark Duling
Yes I've heard of Aruba's solution. But I said Cisco has an opportunity to provide a competitive advantage, as do their competitors such as Aruba. An opportunity to provide a competitive advantage doesn't equal a competitive advantage. That depends on performance or at least perceived

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] For those of you on Cisco code 7.5, supporting Bonjour, etc...

2013-10-11 Thread Chanowski, John
Lee, We have gone ahead and done what you hinted at and made a pact with the devil. We are an Aruba shop but for various reasons we were not in a position to proceed with their enterprise solution this term. When we were approached by various academic departments about using Apple TVs in class

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] For those of you on Cisco code 7.5, supporting Bonjour, etc...

2013-10-11 Thread Lee H Badman
Great information, and perspective. Thanks, John! From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Chanowski, John Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 2:09 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] For

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] For those of you on Cisco code 7.5, supporting Bonjour, etc...

2013-10-10 Thread mike . albano
I am also running 7.5, utilizing the mDNS AP feature. This allows the devices (AppleTV's) to be plugged into a wired connection. Much less channel util. when screen-sharing is only going over Wireless in one direction. It works well. The simple guide is

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] For those of you on Cisco code 7.5, supporting Bonjour, etc...

2013-10-10 Thread Lee H Badman
I'm still seeing a lot of potential drawbacks to this, despite Cisco going above and beyond to accommodate Apple's shame. I also have to wonder- is anyone willingly doing what we all know is also undesirable- popping up one-off topologies for isolated AppleTV and AirPrint (and Chromecast for

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] For those of you on Cisco code 7.5, supporting Bonjour, etc...

2013-10-10 Thread Scott Allen
I am working with Apple and our bookstore to set up a an Airport specifically to support the TunePlay demo station but that's just for the immediate area and not for general use. -Scott On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Lee H Badman lhbad...@syr.edu wrote: I’m still seeing a lot of potential

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] For those of you on Cisco code 7.5, supporting Bonjour, etc...

2013-10-10 Thread Lee H Badman
Same same here From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Scott Allen Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 3:21 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] For those of you on Cisco code 7.5,

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] For those of you on Cisco code 7.5, supporting Bonjour, etc...

2013-10-10 Thread Dan Brisson
And here, although our Bookstore folks are using a Mac Mini with Internet Sharing enabled. The Mac Mini is running the TunePlay software. -dan Dan Brisson Network Engineer University of Vermont (Ph) 802.656.8111 dbris...@uvm.edu On 10/10/13 3:29 PM, Lee H Badman wrote: Same same here

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] For those of you on Cisco code 7.5, supporting Bonjour, etc...

2013-10-10 Thread Mark Duling
... Cisco going above and beyond to accommodate Apple’s shame. Cisco is overjoyed at the opportunity to provide themselves a competitive advantage. Users are overjoyed at the capability. I suppose most IT workers are happy to have the job security that solving visible user-centric problems

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] For those of you on Cisco code 7.5, supporting Bonjour, etc...

2013-10-10 Thread Ian McDonald
Ahh, I'm sure multivendor solutions are great so long as Apple aren't involved in them anywhere, as servers or clients ;) -- ian -Original Message- From: Mark Duling Sent: 10-10-2013, 22:17 To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] For those of you on Cisco code

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] For those of you on Cisco code 7.5, supporting Bonjour, etc...

2013-10-10 Thread Jeff Kell
If you bridge wireless to wired, we have issues as most of our buildings are routed (distributed model) and it breaks down the mobility/roaming flexibility we get by backhauling our APs to central controllers and using common network infrastructure across campus. There are pros and cons to each,