On 11.04.2024 14:03, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 09/04/2024 8:45 pm, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>> On 2024-04-08 09:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 05.04.2024 11:14, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
Remove unneded blank lines between switch clauses.
>>>
>>> "Unneeded" based on what? We're carefully trying to
On 2024-04-11 14:03, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 09/04/2024 8:45 pm, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
On 2024-04-08 09:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.04.2024 11:14, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
Remove unneded blank lines between switch clauses.
"Unneeded" based on what? We're carefully trying to improve
On 09/04/2024 8:45 pm, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> On 2024-04-08 09:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.04.2024 11:14, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>> Remove unneded blank lines between switch clauses.
>>
>> "Unneeded" based on what? We're carefully trying to improve
>> readability of
>> large switch()
On 2024-04-08 09:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.04.2024 11:14, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
Remove unneded blank lines between switch clauses.
"Unneeded" based on what? We're carefully trying to improve readability
of
large switch() statements by adding such blank lines (at least) between
non-
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.04.2024 11:14, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> > Remove unneded blank lines between switch clauses.
>
> "Unneeded" based on what? We're carefully trying to improve readability of
> large switch() statements by adding such blank lines (at least) between non-
On 05.04.2024 11:14, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> Remove unneded blank lines between switch clauses.
"Unneeded" based on what? We're carefully trying to improve readability of
large switch() statements by adding such blank lines (at least) between non-
fall-through case blocks, and you go and remove
Remove unneded blank lines between switch clauses.
Refactor the last clauses so that a violation of
MISRA C Rule 16.2 is resolved (A switch label shall only be used
when the most closely-enclosing compound statement is the body of
a switch statement). The switch clause ending with the
pseudo
