The discussion in https://github.com/sleevi/cabforum-docs/pull/36#discussion_r872103477 could help.
> On 21 Mar 2024, at 09:39, Adriano Santoni via Servercert-wg > <servercert-wg@cabforum.org> wrote: > > All, can anyone help me find the past email discussion, or at least the > rationale that someone wrote somewhere (e.g. on Github?), supporting the > Subject attributes encoding relative order requirement that was introduced in > BR 2.0.0 (Ballot SC-062) ? > > I am talking about ยง7.1.4.2 Subject Attribute Encoding, and specifically > about this language: > > "CAs that include attributes in the Certificate subject field that are listed > in the table below > SHALL encode those attributes in the relative order as they appear in the > table and follow the > specified encoding requirements for the attribute." > > I do not recall, and cannot find, a discussion on this mailing list on this > particular topic. Maybe I just missed a whole bunch of email messages due to > some otherwise undetected email problem. I also did a search on Github, > starting from the links provided at > https://cabforum.org/2023/03/17/ballot-sc62v2-certificate-profiles-update/), > but was unable to figure out who proposed it and, above all, for what reason. > > Adriano > _______________________________________________ > Servercert-wg mailing list > Servercert-wg@cabforum.org > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.cabforum.org_mailman_listinfo_servercert-2Dwg&d=DwICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=-bX5hBm1IdRDykQ-dBR8tsFRCM4v1VXUyG7RZa2WqPY&m=TmnUymVu4aN7JJUi7E4FNf5W7JAuYX7-j6JtyhXK9EAAxJqhk7RvTa9sOsMmibge&s=pzZ-HMcq_CggzRO87gqT5_XxYy9n5hIbsxrERd7c_so&e=
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Servercert-wg mailing list Servercert-wg@cabforum.org https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
