On 21 Nov 2017, at 16:27, Drago, William @ CSG - NARDA-MITEQ wrote: > Please, not a forum. The email list is instant, dynamic, and convenient. I > don't think checking into a forum to stay current with the brisk activity > here is very practical or appealing.
I agree with Bill on this. It seems to me that the idea of re-architecting such a useful communications channel as this mailing list on account of a cluster of false positives raised by a single provider's triage system would best be characterized as an example of "the tail wagging the dog". I use this provider's service for the major bulk of my e-mail because the university where I used to work, which provides a continued e-mail service to retirees, long ago outsourced its previously in-house e-mail system, which I once had a hand in running, to Google. In my experience, this provider's triage system does a pretty good job, with very few false positives. I see the current high incidence of mis-classification of messages received through the SQLite mailing list as an aberration. Since the triage system is open to tuning by each recipient for their own incoming mail, I suggest that all that is needed is for each subscriber to this list who depends (as I do) on GMail for their mail feed, to apply this tuning for themselves. I found instructions here: https://support.google.com/mail/answer/6579 and have now set up the following filter: Matches: to:(sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org) Do this: Never send it to Spam Best regards, Niall O'Reilly
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
