Yes, but will that not demand that your index page be a HTML file rather
than JSP?  If you have an index page that has dynamic pieces as well as
static ones - or uses, say, templates (struts templates that is), you've
just shot yourself in the foot, haven't you?

Additional Thoughts,

Eddie

----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Chew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:21 PM
Subject: RE: changing from *.do to /do/* screws up everything?


>
> An alternative to putting it in the WEB-INF is to use Apache to filter the
> request, eg:
>
>   <Location /*.jsp>
>     Deny from all
>   </Location>
>
> This has the advantage of:
> - if you decide not to disallow JSPs, you can
> - when you are developing, it's often handy to view the JSPs without going
> through the actions first (eg want to see if your table looks ok)
>
> Some thoughts
> Keith
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 28 February 2002 7:44 a.m.
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: changing from *.do to /do/* screws up everything?
>
>
> Ok, silly question time.  Why would you want to put your pages under
> WEB-INF?  Honestly, I don't see why you would, but ... I'm hardly a
'guru'.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Eddie
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rob Breeds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 11:58 AM
> Subject: Re: changing from *.do to /do/* screws up everything?
>
>
> >
> > Thanks for suggestion but I can't use <html:base> because all my JSPs
are
> > under WEB-INF\pages
> >
> > Putting <html:base/> in will cause images (and any relative urls) to
have
> > URLs of
> > <img src="WEB-INF/pages/images/find_obj.gif">
> >
> > which is even worse (doesn't work at all) and defeats the point of
putting
> > pages under WEB-INF!
> >
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > |--------+------------------------->
> > |        |          Bryan          |
> > |        |          Field-Elliot   |
> > |        |          <bryan_lists@ne|
> > |        |          tmeme.org>     |
> > |        |                         |
> > |        |          27/02/2002     |
> > |        |          17:49          |
> > |        |          Please respond |
> > |        |          to "Struts     |
> > |        |          Users Mailing  |
> > |        |          List"          |
> > |        |                         |
> > |--------+------------------------->
> >
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------|
> >   |
> |
> >   |      To:     Struts Users Mailing List
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |
> >   |      cc:
> |
> >   |      Subject:     Re: changing from *.do to /do/* screws up
> everything?                                               |
> >   |
> |
> >   |
> |
> >
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------|
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Put this inside the <head> block of all your JSP pages:
> >
> > <html:base/>
> >
> > Here is a URL to the docs for this tag:
> >
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/doc-1.0.2/struts-html.html#base
> >
> > It solves exactly this problem.
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> > On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 10:39, Rob Breeds wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I hope this is me being dumb but I have a working Struts application
> that
> > > uses a *.do servlet mapping for ActionServlet
> > >
> > > Because I found that the servlet spec doesn't allow partial URL
mappings
> > > for security (eg. I can't specify a url-mapping of '/pub*'), I must
now
> > > change my app to use /do/*
> > >
> > > Seems like a fine idea, and Ted says its cool :)
> > >
> > > So, I changed the servlet mapping to '/do/*' and references to '*.do'
in
> > my
> > > JSPs.
> > >
> > > Now my app sort of works but all relative links are now broken - CSS,
> > > images, JavaScript files
> > >
> > > e.g. I have a URL of '<rest of path>/do/header' and this is specified
in
> > > the config  file as:
> > >
> > >           <action path="/header" forward="/WEB-INF/pages/header.jsp"/>
> > >
> > > The page loads OK but the JSP references images like this:
> > >
> > > <img src="images/find_obj.gif">
> > >
> > > This used to work because images was a directory directly under the
war
> > > directory, but now, the image has a path of <img src
> > > ="/do/images/find_obj.gif"> which isn't found. Simarly for references
to
> > > CSS files and JS files.
> > >
> > > why is the /do/ prefix being added?
> > >
> > >
> > > Please could anyone tell me what I have to do to get my JS, CSS and
> > images
> > > to load without changing every reference  to them in every JSP to
> include
> > a
> > > /do/?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Rob
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to