<sarcasm>
<disclaimer>this tag may include content you can't see the funny side 
of</disclaimer>
<workaround>please read the whole post and go have a walk before replying in 
anger</workaround>

Oh dear! A pre-release version of the next Ubuntu includes a massive
change to an essential element of user interface: the close button is
now on the left! The world is going to end!

OK, so what? If I look at all the window managers I've used in the past
apart from Gnome, I count: Amiga OS (1.3), Motif, CDE, Ye Olde Mac
Classic, Mac OS-X, whatever the WM was on SunOS 4.x and the old HP-PA,
Windows 3.1 to Vista. The only thing I can say is that the positions of
the Close, Minimise and Maximise buttons has been quite varied. In fact,
the only OS in here that ever had the Close button in the top right
corner was... Windows 95/NT4 and above. Every other one had it in the
top left corner.

The current argument reminds me of the time when we upgraded customers
from Windows NT 3.51 to NT 4. Microsoft did something terrible with NT
4: they replaced the application launcher window with this weird bar at
the bottom that had a "Start" button and they moved the Close button
from top left to top right! How dare they? My customers were up in arms.
Granted, considering said customers were FX and equity traders, some of
them had an IQ inversely proportional to their earnings and found it
difficult to adapt to the change, but still. Every time I visited them,
I was told: "We'll call your boss, you'll lose your job over this! We'll
go to the competition! Microsoft will crash down in flames for doing
this!" Did I lose my job? No. Did they go to the competition? No. Did
Microsoft crash down in flames? Hell no, otherwise we wouldn't have bug
#1!

</sarcasm>

Having said this, is this a major change? Yes. Should it be pulled back?
No, not now and here's why:

1. Despite the fact that this thread seems to indicate that the whole
Ubuntu community is up in arms, this is not the case because the sample
of users in this thread is a self-selecting one. The users who see no
problem with the change will never find this thread because they won't
go looking for it. On the other hand, every single user who disagrees
with the change will go to Launchpad, find the thread and add his own
negative comment. So whatever data this thread contributes to the
problem is by definition biased and should therefore not be used in the
decision. On the other hand, that same data provides an interesting set
of test cases as it shows a varied range of opinions and experience,
which is useful for my second point.

2. Such a usability change can only be validated or invalidated by
widespread user testing. No amount of polls, reviews or limited
usability studies will tell you whether the change is a good one or not.
And, guess what? A beta release is exactly the right way to do such
testing: it's stable enough that you can give it to non-technical users
but you still have the option to correct bugs before the final release.
I suspect this is exactly why Mark Shuttleworth said that the current
button layout would stay *for the duration of beta 1 at least*. And I
believe that, if beta testing were to show that the change has a
definite negative impact on usability, it would be reverted before full
release.

So, how, as a community, can we perform user testing on this change?
Install the beta, use it, try it out as it comes out of the box. And for
those who say that they support non-technical users, get them to play
with it. But don't tell them anything, let them find out what's new. I'm
sure you'll be surprised by who adapts well to the change and who
doesn't.

Now can we please all calm down and help make Lucid the best Ubuntu yet?

-- 
[light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to 
"menu:minimize,maximize,close"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to