We do maintain it but in apache repo itself. However Pig cannot do
orchestration for you. I am not sure what you are looking at from Pig in
this context.

Regards,
Mayur Rustagi
Ph: +1 (760) 203 3257
http://www.sigmoid.com <http://www.sigmoidanalytics.com/>
@mayur_rustagi <http://www.twitter.com/mayur_rustagi>

On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here was latest modification in spork repo:
> Mon Dec 1 10:08:19 2014
>
> Not sure if it is being actively maintained.
>
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Qiang Cao <caoqiang...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the pointer, Ashish! I was also looking at Spork
>> https://github.com/sigmoidanalytics/spork Pig-on-Spark), but wasn't sure
>> if that's the right direction.
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Ashish Nigam <ashnigamt...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You have to call spark-submit from oozie.
>>> I used this link to get the idea for my implementation -
>>>
>>>
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/oozie-user/201404.mbox/%3CCAHCsPn-0Grq1rSXrAZu35yy_i4T=fvovdox2ugpcuhkwmjp...@mail.gmail.com%3E
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 28, 2015, at 3:25 PM, Qiang Cao <caoqiang...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks, Ashish! Is Oozie integrated with Spark? I knew it can
>>> accommodate some Hadoop jobs.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Ashish Nigam <ashnigamt...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Qiang,
>>>> Did you look at Oozie?
>>>> We use oozie to run spark jobs in production.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 28, 2015, at 2:45 PM, Qiang Cao <caoqiang...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> We need to deal with workflows on Spark. In our scenario, each workflow
>>>> consists of multiple processing steps. Among different steps, there could
>>>> be dependencies.  I'm wondering if there are tools available that can
>>>> help us schedule and manage workflows on Spark. I'm looking for something
>>>> like pig on Hadoop, but it should fully function on Spark.
>>>>
>>>> Any suggestion?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>
>>>> Qiang
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to