Ted, thx. Should I repost?
Am 31.10.2015 17:41 schrieb "Ted Yu" <yuzhih...@gmail.com>:

> From the result of http://search-hadoop.com/?q=spark+Martin+Senne ,
> Martin's post Tuesday didn't go through.
>
> FYI
>
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Nicholas Chammas <
> nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Nabble is an unofficial archive of this mailing list. I don't know who
>> runs it, but it's not Apache. There are often delays between when things
>> get posted to the list and updated on Nabble, and sometimes things never
>> make it over for whatever reason.
>>
>> This mailing list is, I agree, very 1980s. Unfortunately, it's required
>> by the Apache Software Foundation (ASF).
>>
>> There was a discussion earlier this year
>> <https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spark-user/201412.mbox/%3CCAOhmDzfL2COdysV8r5hZN8f=NqXM=f=oy5no2dhwj_kveop...@mail.gmail.com%3E>
>>  about
>> migrating to Discourse that explained why we're stuck with what we have for
>> now. Ironically, that discussion is hard to follow on the Apache archives
>> (which is precisely one of the motivations for proposing to migrate to
>> Discourse), but there is a more readable archive on another unofficial
>> site
>> <http://search-hadoop.com/m/q3RTtzu5vu1tD3w52&subj=Discourse+A+proposed+alternative+to+the+Spark+User+list>
>> .
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:20 PM Martin Senne <
>> martin.se...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Having written a post on last Tuesday, I'm still not able to see my post
>>> under nabble. And yeah, subscription to u...@apache.spark.org was
>>> successful (rechecked a minute ago)
>>>
>>> Even more, I have no way (and no confirmation) that my post was
>>> accepted, rejected, whatever.
>>>
>>> This is very L4M3 and so 80ies.
>>>
>>> Any help appreciated. Thx!
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to