On 24/09/15 08:10 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Jan Pokorný <jpoko...@redhat.com> schrieb am 23.09.2015 um 22:30 in
> Nachricht <20150923203005.ga10...@redhat.com>:
>> On 23/09/15 15:38 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>> In times of BASH it's hard to get POSIX shell documentation.
>> 
>> Oh, really?
>> 
>> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html 
> 
> Thanks for the pointer! What I wanted to says is: When reading the BASH
> documentation, it's increasingly hard to find out what is POSIX and what iS
> BASHism.

Can only agree, especially when POSIX conformance switches for Bash are
not strict/powerful enough.  This probably explains demand for tools like
checkbashisms.

-- 
Jan (Poki)

Attachment: pgpw1uRh3x2oB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to