Classified as: {OPEN}

 

Well… why do you say that « Well if corosync isn't  there that this is to be 
expected and pacemaker won't recover corosync.”?

In my mind, Corosync is managed by Pacemaker as any other cluster resource and 
the "pacemakerd: recover properly from > Corosync crash" fix implemented in 
version 2.1.2 seems confirm that.

 

 

{OPEN}

De : NOLIBOS Christophe 
Envoyé : jeudi 18 avril 2024 17:56
À : 'Klaus Wenninger' <kwenn...@redhat.com>; Cluster Labs - All topics related 
to open-source clustering welcomed <users@clusterlabs.org>
Cc : Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com>
Objet : RE: [ClusterLabs] "pacemakerd: recover properly from Corosync crash" fix

 

Classified as: {OPEN}

 

 

[~]$ systemctl status corosync

● corosync.service - Corosync Cluster Engine

   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/corosync.service; enabled; vendor 
preset: disabled)

   Active: failed (Result: signal) since Thu 2024-04-18 14:58:42 UTC; 53min ago

     Docs: man:corosync

           man:corosync.conf

           man:corosync_overview

  Process: 2027251 ExecStop=/usr/sbin/corosync-cfgtool -H --force (code=exited, 
status=0/SUCCESS)

  Process: 1324906 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/corosync -f $COROSYNC_OPTIONS 
(code=killed, signal=KILL)

Main PID: 1324906 (code=killed, signal=KILL)

 

Apr 18 13:16:04 - corosync[1324906]:   [QUORUM] Sync joined[1]: 1

Apr 18 13:16:04 - corosync[1324906]:   [TOTEM ] A new membership (1.1c8) was 
formed. Members joined: 1

Apr 18 13:16:04 - corosync[1324906]:   [VOTEQ ] Waiting for all cluster 
members. Current votes: 1 expected_votes: 2

Apr 18 13:16:04 - corosync[1324906]:   [VOTEQ ] Waiting for all cluster 
members. Current votes: 1 expected_votes: 2

Apr 18 13:16:04 - corosync[1324906]:   [VOTEQ ] Waiting for all cluster 
members. Current votes: 1 expected_votes: 2

Apr 18 13:16:04 - corosync[1324906]:   [QUORUM] Members[1]: 1

Apr 18 13:16:04 - corosync[1324906]:   [MAIN  ] Completed service 
synchronization, ready to provide service.

Apr 18 13:16:04 - systemd[1]: Started Corosync Cluster Engine.

Apr 18 14:58:42 - systemd[1]: corosync.service: Main process exited, 
code=killed, status=9/KILL

Apr 18 14:58:42 - systemd[1]: corosync.service: Failed with result 'signal'.

[~]$

 

 

De : Klaus Wenninger <kwenn...@redhat.com <mailto:kwenn...@redhat.com> > 
Envoyé : jeudi 18 avril 2024 17:43
À : Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed 
<users@clusterlabs.org <mailto:users@clusterlabs.org> >
Cc : Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com <mailto:kgail...@redhat.com> >; NOLIBOS 
Christophe <christophe.noli...@thalesgroup.com 
<mailto:christophe.noli...@thalesgroup.com> >
Objet : Re: [ClusterLabs] "pacemakerd: recover properly from Corosync crash" fix

 

 

 

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 5:07 PM NOLIBOS Christophe via Users 
<users@clusterlabs.org <mailto:users@clusterlabs.org> > wrote:

Classified as: {OPEN}

I'm using RedHat 8.8 (4.18.0-477.21.1.el8_8.x86_64).
When I kill Corosync, no new corosync process is created and pacemaker is in 
failure.
The only solution is to restart the pacemaker service.

[~]$ pcs status
Error: unable to get cib
[~]$

[~]$systemctl status pacemaker
● pacemaker.service - Pacemaker High Availability Cluster Manager
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/pacemaker.service; enabled; vendor 
preset: disabled)
   Active: active (running) since Thu 2024-04-18 13:16:04 UTC; 1h 43min ago
     Docs: man:pacemakerd
           https://clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/doc/
 Main PID: 1324923 (pacemakerd)
    Tasks: 91
   Memory: 132.1M
   CGroup: /system.slice/pacemaker.service
...
Apr 18 14:59:02 - pacemakerd[1324923]:  crit: Could not connect to Corosync 
CFG: CS_ERR_LIBRARY
Apr 18 14:59:03 - pacemakerd[1324923]:  crit: Could not connect to Corosync 
CFG: CS_ERR_LIBRARY
Apr 18 14:59:04 - pacemakerd[1324923]:  crit: Could not connect to Corosync 
CFG: CS_ERR_LIBRARY
Apr 18 14:59:05 - pacemakerd[1324923]:  crit: Could not connect to Corosync 
CFG: CS_ERR_LIBRARY
Apr 18 14:59:06 - pacemakerd[1324923]:  crit: Could not connect to Corosync 
CFG: CS_ERR_LIBRARY
Apr 18 14:59:07 - pacemakerd[1324923]:  crit: Could not connect to Corosync 
CFG: CS_ERR_LIBRARY
Apr 18 14:59:08 - pacemakerd[1324923]:  crit: Could not connect to Corosync 
CFG: CS_ERR_LIBRARY
Apr 18 14:59:09 - pacemakerd[1324923]:  crit: Could not connect to Corosync 
CFG: CS_ERR_LIBRARY
Apr 18 14:59:10 - pacemakerd[1324923]:  crit: Could not connect to Corosync 
CFG: CS_ERR_LIBRARY
Apr 18 14:59:11 - pacemakerd[1324923]:  crit: Could not connect to Corosync 
CFG: CS_ERR_LIBRARY
[~]$

Well if corosync isn't  there that this is to be expected and pacemaker won't 
recover corosync.

Can you check what systemd thinks about corosync (status/journal). 

 

Klaus


{OPEN}

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com <mailto:kgail...@redhat.com> > 
Envoyé : jeudi 18 avril 2024 16:40
À : Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed 
<users@clusterlabs.org <mailto:users@clusterlabs.org> >
Cc : NOLIBOS Christophe <christophe.noli...@thalesgroup.com 
<mailto:christophe.noli...@thalesgroup.com> >
Objet : Re: [ClusterLabs] "pacemakerd: recover properly from Corosync crash" fix

What OS are you using? Does it use systemd?

What does happen when you kill Corosync?

On Thu, 2024-04-18 at 13:13 +0000, NOLIBOS Christophe via Users wrote:
> Classified as: {OPEN}
> 
> Dear All,
>  
> I have a question about the "pacemakerd: recover properly from 
> Corosync crash" fix implemented in version 2.1.2.
> I have observed the issue when testing pacemaker version 2.0.5, just 
> by killing the ‘corosync’ process: Corosync was not recovered.
>  
> I am using now pacemaker version 2.1.5-8.
> Doing the same test, I have the same result: Corosync is still not 
> recovered.
>  
> Please confirm the "pacemakerd: recover properly from Corosync crash"
> fix implemented in version 2.1.2 covers this scenario.
> If it is, did I miss something in the configuration of my cluster?
>  
> Best Regard.
>  
> Christophe.
>   
>  
> 
> {OPEN}
> _______________________________________________
> Manage your subscription:
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
--
Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com <mailto:kgail...@redhat.com> >
_______________________________________________
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/

 

{OPEN}

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/

Reply via email to