On 2024-04-10 at 21:19:48 UTC-0400 (Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:19:48 -0500) Darrell Budic <bu...@onholyground.com> is rumored to have said:
>> On Apr 10, 2024, at 2:52 PM, Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.eu> wrote: >> >> Darrell Budic skrev den 2024-04-10 19:48: >> >>> Anything I’m missing? >> >> using amavisd ? >> >> then try this in amavisd.conf: >> >> >> @spam_scanners = ( >> # ['SpamAssassin', 'Amavis::SpamControl::SpamAssassin'], >> ['SpamdClient', 'Amavis::SpamControl::SpamdClient'] >> ); >> >> 1; # insure a defined return value >> >> if this works, its amavisd missing to add that header spamassassin add in >> add-header >> >> dont enable both spam_scanners, just one of them, and with the last start >> spamd, as you have you already have this >> >> would be nice if its just that >> > > No, I”m using spamass-milter to send it over from postfix. Here’s my > spamass-milter config in case I missed something there (systemd running it on > alma 8 in this case): > > EXTRA_FLAGS="-e onholyground.com -u defang -m -r 15 -i 127.0.0.1 -g sa-milt > -- --max-size=5120000 --dest=sa0.int.ohgnetworks.com,sa1.int.ohgnetworks.com > --randomize" That's intriguing because "-u defang" looks like cargo-cult spoor from an installation running MIMEDefang. Does the user 'defang' have appropriate configs? > Both sa0 & sa1 run the same spamassassin/spamd configurations, neither of > them add the X-Spam-ASN headers. All other add_header entries work fine. Validate that configs on both machines match. In this sort of setup, only the SA config on the spamd hosts of the user spamd is run as makes any difference. -- Bill Cole b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org (AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses) Not Currently Available For Hire
