Maybe we can move the CDI module to wicket-stuff or somewhere else till there is an implementation for those?
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 11:08 AM Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: > Since we use a local copy of commons-fileupload2 I see no stopper for a > release! A milestone one or a release candidate. > > The last problem is in the CDI module - several dependencies still miss > jakarta impls (e.g. cdi-unit). I cannot say how big of an issue this is for > a Wicket itself. > > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 11:01 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < > reier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > As far as I know release of wicket 10 is blocked by commons upload > project. > > That project has been cloned as part of wicket 10.x branch and we have > > fixed at least one bug in it (and in parallel in the original project). > > Maybe other more experienced committers can comment? > > > > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:52 AM János Cserép <cserepja...@pilar.hu> > > wrote: > > > > > Just a thought... > > > > > > I've been using Wicket 10 snapshot builds in production for over a year > > now > > > with latest Spring and Jakarta libs without any major issues, so if > that > > is > > > an option for you, go ahead. You can mitigate risks by creating release > > > from a known git rev yourself if your release process does not like > > > SNAPSHOT dependencies. > > > > > > j > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 25 May 2023 at 09:15, Tony Tkacik <tony.tka...@evolveum.com > > > .invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to ask about your timeline / plans regarding release of > > > > Wicket 10? > > > > > > > > We are in process of upgrading our open-source project midPoint to > > latest > > > > Spring releases and that requires Wicket to be updated to version 10 > > > > in order to support Spring 6. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Anton Tkacik > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro > > > -- Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
