Oh my... Now I understand the hub-bub. Yes, there were 100 comments calling Josh those terms, not that the people leaving them were F&H's. That's not what I meant at all.
After rereading my message with a different spin, it certainly looks like I'm describing the people leaving the messages. I'll just go back to vlogging... Mike --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Markus Sandy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Moon" <mgmoon@> wrote: > > > > Hahaha... brilliant. > > > > I love the support you can get on Youtube... 100 fag and homo comments > > plus a couple clever responses like: "McCheco (9 minutes ago) > > f*ck you asshole you had waste too much candy bitch i wish you burn in > > hell for this shit". > > > > > The other day Deirdre mentioned giving folks on the list the benefit > of the doubt. > > This looks like a good time to do that :) > > I'm assumming that "fag and homo comments" is descriptive of the > contents of the comments as opposed to being descriptive of the > authors of those comments. > > Right??? >
