I have seen some skeptopaths say that an HBomb is an example of Controlled Hot Fusion (CHF). This is, of course, an extremely stupid position. An HBomb is an UNcontrolled reaction. We have pissed hundreds of $billions trying to CONTROL that reaction, such as with lasers, magnetic confinement, and other things. What is the result, after spending so much money trying to control the HBomb? Nothing.
The following interaction is an example. It is also useful because he hints that Solar Energy is an example of CHF, even though CHF funds NEVER went into solar power. NEVER. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=23#23 To: *Kevmo* Right, because no one has ever *seen* useful amounts of energy produced by fusion. It's like arguing with a deaf 2 year old. 23 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=23#23> posted on *Wed 05 Feb 2014 08:46:23 PM PST* by Toddsterpatriot<http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Etoddsterpatriot/>(Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.) [ Post Reply <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/reply?c=23> | Private Reply<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3114918.23;reftype=comment>| To 21 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#21> | View Replies <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/replies?c=23> | Report Abuse <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/abuse?c=23>] ------------------------------ To: *Toddsterpatriot* By ALL FREEPING MEANS, post where ANY amount of Useful Energy has been produced by CHF. H-Bombs are not an example of CHF. But if you want to argue from that premise, it will be useful for the asked & answered offsite knowlege storage & reference. 24 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=24#24> posted on *Wed 05 Feb 2014 09:02:04 PM PST* by Kevmo <http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Ekevmo/> ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who) [ Post Reply <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/reply?c=24> | Private Reply<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3114918.24;reftype=comment>| To 23 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#23> | View Replies <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/replies?c=24> | Report Abuse <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/abuse?c=24>] ------------------------------ To: *Kevmo* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_energy 25 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=25#25> posted on *Wed 05 Feb 2014 09:27:12 PM PST* by Toddsterpatriot<http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Etoddsterpatriot/>(Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.) [ Post Reply <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/reply?c=25> | Private Reply<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3114918.25;reftype=comment>| To 24 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#24> | View Replies <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/replies?c=25> | Report Abuse <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/abuse?c=25>] ------------------------------ To: *Toddsterpatriot* That is a demonstration of supposedly Controlled Hot Fusion? Where does 'fusion' occur within those solar cells? It doesn't. Everyone knows that except you. Your CHF fraud boys produced Zip, as usual. 26 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=26#26> posted on *Wed 05 Feb 2014 09:32:41 PM PST* by Kevmo <http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Ekevmo/> ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who) [ Post Reply <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/reply?c=26> | Private Reply<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3114918.26;reftype=comment>| To 25 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#25> | View Replies <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/replies?c=26> | Report Abuse <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/abuse?c=26>] ------------------------------ To: *Kevmo* Right, because no one has ever *seen* useful amounts of energy produced by fusion. Deaf and blind. 27 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=27#27> posted on *Thu 06 Feb 2014 06:08:38 AM PST* by Toddsterpatriot<http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Etoddsterpatriot/>(Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.) [ Post Reply <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/reply?c=27> | Private Reply<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3114918.27;reftype=comment>| To 26 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#26> | View Replies <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/replies?c=27> | Report Abuse <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/abuse?c=27>] ------------------------------ To: *Toddsterpatriot* There is nothing controlled nor useful about an H-Bomb. It is UNcontrolled. It's the difference between 13th century Chinese gunpowder bombs and 21st century Internal Combustion Engines. 700 years difference, control vs. uncontrolled. But someone as ignorant as you is calling an Hbomb "useful" amounts of energy produced. Go ahead and stand next to one and let it go off to prove to us how useful it is to you. 28 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=28#28> posted on *Thu 06 Feb 2014 01:57:29 PM PST* by Kevmo <http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Ekevmo/> ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who) [ Post Reply <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/reply?c=28> | Private Reply<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3114918.28;reftype=comment>| To 27 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#27> | View Replies <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/replies?c=28> | Report Abuse <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/abuse?c=28>] ------------------------------ To: *Kevmo* Damn, you're denser than osmium. *There is nothing controlled nor useful about an H-Bomb. It is UNcontrolled. * I've never heard of an H-bomb going off accidentally. Have you? I'm pretty sure most H-bomb tests were successful. Seems controlled to me. *But someone as ignorant as you is calling an Hbomb "useful" amounts of energy produced. * Can you read? Right, because no one has ever *seen* useful amounts of energy produced by fusion. Are you under the impression that the only fusion we've seen was in an H-bomb? 29 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#29> posted on *Thu 06 Feb 2014 05:24:24 PM PST* by Toddsterpatriot<http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Etoddsterpatriot/>(Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.) [ Post Reply <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/reply?c=29> | Private Reply<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3114918.29;reftype=comment>| To 28 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#28> | View Replies <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/replies?c=29> | Report Abuse <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/abuse?c=29>] ------------------------------ To: *Toddsterpatriot* Damn, you're denser than osmium. ***which would make you as stupid as a bag of rocks. I've never heard of an H-bomb going off accidentally. Have you? ***Case in point, right here. Just look how incredibly stupid your argument is. Your argument is that because you can decide WHEN it's going to blow up, that is an example of CHF. So, after hundreds of $billions trying to control this reaction, the best we have is an on switch, no off switch, and entire populations vaporized. That is YOUR example of controlled hot fusion, a hot fusion car, a hot fusion water heater, a hot fusion jet pack. I'd be more than happy to stand for an hour next to a Cold Fusion reaction; and it would make me happy to see you stand for just a few seconds next to your shining example of Controlled Hot Fusion while it's turned on, as long as I'm a continent away. I'm pretty sure most H-bomb tests were successful. ***And we've spent hundreds of $billions trying to control that reaction so we can use it. By your own admission, the only "control" we have over the reaction is when to turn it on. In the meantime, guys like Hagelstein are running Cold Fusion cells for MONTHS. My goodness, it just boggles the imagination to see someone so stupid as to promote an atom bomb as an example of a controlled, useful reaction. You can't be that stupid. But when we look over your posts, yup, you are that stupid. Seems controlled to me. ***Yup. You ARE that stupid. Kevmo: But someone as ignorant as you is calling an Hbomb "useful" amounts of energy produced. Toddiot: Can you read? Right, because no one has ever seen useful amounts of energy produced by fusion. ***So, it's so useful to you? Hundreds of $billions have been spent trying to control the power of the hbomb, and what do we have to show for it? The fact you can SEE it from afar? That's USEFUL? Keep in mind this is money spent well after the HBomb was produced. Its aim was directly to turn it into a useful and controlled energy source. The best we have is that we can stand 100 miles away and SEE an HBomb go off. And that's supposedly hundreds of $millions well spent. Only a stupid person could hold such a position. And you DO hold such a position. Are you under the impression that the only fusion we've seen was in an H-bomb? ***No, we've seen fusion in that star that hangs in the sky. So, now your position is that we've spent hundreds of $billions trying to control this HBomb reaction and the best we have to show for controlled hot fusion is that you can go outside and look at the sun? WTF? What was that money fraudulently spent on? We could go and look at the sun long before that money was spent, and if only 2% of it were spent on Cold Fusion instead of CHF, we'd have LENR cars by now. 30 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=30#30> posted on *Thu 06 Feb 2014 06:08:18 PM PST* by Kevmo <http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Ekevmo/> ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who) [ Post Reply <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/reply?c=30> | Private Reply<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3114918.30;reftype=comment>| To 29 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#29> | View Replies <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/replies?c=30> | Report Abuse <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/abuse?c=30>] On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm growing weary of the same objections, over and over and over again on > various internet sites. So I'm going to post each q&a here & just send > links. > > >
