On Thursday, August 28, 2014, Derric Atzrott <datzr...@alizeepathology.com> wrote:
> > Just in case it helps, I have created a task for this RfC at > > http://fab.wmflabs.org/T572. Please identify current blockers there (or > > here) in order to focus the contributions in the tasks that matter. > > Shouldn't this be on Bugzilla instead of Phabricator? This bug has > nothing to do with Phabricator and I thought we were currently only > using Phabricator for bugs related to Phabricator. The architecture committee and the engineering community team agreed to use Phabricator in this fine-tuned RfC process. See https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2014-August/078025.html for the related announcement. "We need to agree on Requests for comment/HTML templating library" is not a bug strictly speaking. Hopefully in a month we will not need to discuss about Bugzilla vs Phabricator because we will all be using the latter. -- Quim Gil Engineering Community Manager @ Wikimedia Foundation http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
