Hi Juergen,

On 05/02/2024 11:08, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 05.02.24 11:55, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,

On 05/02/2024 10:49, Juergen Gross wrote:
This series is adding 9pfs support to Xenstore-stubdom, enabling it
to do logging to a dom0 directory.

This is a prerequisite for the final goal to add live update support
to Xenstore-stubdom, as it enables the stubdom to store its state in
a dom0 file.

The 9pfs backend is a new daemon written from scratch. Using a
dedicated 9pfs daemon has several advantages:

- it is using much less resources than a full blown qemu process
- it can serve multiple guests (the idea is to use it for other
   infrastructure domains, like qemu-stubdom or driver domains, too)
- it is designed to support several security enhancements, like
   limiting the number of files for a guest, or limiting the allocated
   file system space
- it doesn't support file links (neither hard nor soft links) or
   referencing parent directories via "..", minimizing the risk that
   a guest can "escape" from its home directory

Note that for now the daemon only contains the minimal needed
functionality to do logging from Xenstore-stubdom. I didn't want to
add all the 9pfs commands and security add-ons in the beginning, in
order to avoid needless efforts in case the idea of the daemon is
being rejected.

Changes in V4:
- patch 2 of V3 was applied
- added support of reading directories
- addressed review comments

Changes in V3:
- new patches 1, 23-25
- addressed review comments

Changes in V2:
- support of multiple rings per device
- xenlogd->xen-9pfsd rename
- addressed review comments
- fixed some bugs

Juergen Gross (32):
   tools: add access macros for unaligned data
   tools: add a new xen logging daemon
   tools/xen-9pfsd: connect to frontend
   tools/xen-9pfsd: add transport layer
   tools/xen-9pfsd: add 9pfs response generation support
   tools/xen-9pfsd: add 9pfs version request support
   tools/xen-9pfsd: add 9pfs attach request support
   tools/xen-9pfsd: add 9pfs walk request support
   tools/xen-9pfsd: add 9pfs open request support
   tools/xen-9pfsd: add 9pfs clunk request support
   tools/xen-9pfsd: add 9pfs create request support
   tools/xen-9pfsd: add 9pfs stat request support
   tools/xen-9pfsd: add 9pfs write request support
   tools/xen-9pfsd: add 9pfs read request support
   tools/libs/light: add backend type for 9pfs PV devices
   tools/xl: support new 9pfs backend xen_9pfsd
   tools/helpers: allocate xenstore event channel for xenstore stubdom
   tools/xenstored: rename xenbus_evtchn()
   stubdom: extend xenstore stubdom configs
   tools: add 9pfs device to xenstore-stubdom
   tools/xenstored: add early_init() function
   tools/xenstored: move systemd handling to posix.c
   tools/xenstored: move all log-pipe handling into posix.c
   tools/xenstored: move all socket handling into posix.c
   tools/xenstored: get own domid in stubdom case
   tools/xenstored: rework ring page (un)map functions
   tools/xenstored: split domain_init()
   tools/xenstored: map stubdom interface
   tools/xenstored: mount 9pfs device in stubdom
   tools/xenstored: add helpers for filename handling
   tools/xenstored: support complete log capabilities in stubdom
   tools/xenstored: have a single do_control_memreport()

I haven't checked what's the state of the 9PFS patches. Can part of the xenstored changes be committed without the 9PFS changes?

The following patches can go in without the 9pfs daemon:

It looks like the gitalb CI is not happy with the following patches [1]:

In function ‘free_stat’,
    inlined from ‘write_9pfs’ at 9pfront.c:935:9:
9pfront.c:120:14: error: ‘stat.name’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
  120 |     free(stat->name);
      |          ~~~~^~~~~~
9pfront.c: In function ‘write_9pfs’:
9pfront.c:929:20: note: ‘stat’ declared here
  929 |     struct p9_stat stat;
      |                    ^~~~

I think...


tools/helpers: allocate xenstore event channel for xenstore stubdom
tools/xenstored: rename xenbus_evtchn()
stubdom: extend xenstore stubdom configs

.. this is related to this patch. Can you have a look?

I have just pushed a new branch without this patch. Let see if the CI [2] will pass this time.

tools/xenstored: add early_init() function
tools/xenstored: move systemd handling to posix.c
tools/xenstored: move all log-pipe handling into posix.c
tools/xenstored: move all socket handling into posix.c
tools/xenstored: get own domid in stubdom case
tools/xenstored: rework ring page (un)map functions
tools/xenstored: split domain_init()
tools/xenstored: map stubdom interface

Cheers,

[1] https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/julieng/xen/-/pipelines/1165147815
[2] https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/julieng/xen/-/pipelines/1165166977

--
Julien Grall

Reply via email to