On 19.03.2024 08:33, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 18.03.2024 19:13, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> I'm not sure about FSRSC as a name, but it definitely beats AMD's longhand >> name of FAST_REP_SCASB. > > With FSRS already used, I guess that's the closest we can get to keep > names for similar features similar. > >> --- a/tools/misc/xen-cpuid.c >> +++ b/tools/misc/xen-cpuid.c >> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ static const char *const str_e1c[32] = >> [24] = "perfctr-nb", /* [25] */ >> [26] = "dbx", [27] = "perftsc", >> [28] = "pcx-l2i", [29] = "monitorx", >> + [30] = "dbext2", >> }; > > AMD calls this AddrMaskExt (PM) or AdMskExtn (PPR). I can see where your > different name choice is coming from, yet I still wonder whether we should > try to stay closer where possible.
Having located the corresponding doc, Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> with a slight preference to adjusted names for this one feature. Jan
