On 13.05.2024 22:11, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 10:44:59AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> Why do you mask the device SBDF in the above snippet? I would really >> like to understand what's so privacy relevant in a PCI SBDF number. > > I doubt it reveals much. Simply seems unlikely to help debugging and > therefore I prefer to mask it.
SBDF in one place may be matchable against a memory address in another place. _Any_ hiding of information is hindering analysis. Please can you finally accept that it needs to be the person doing the analysis to judge what is or is not relevant to them? Jan
