Phil Race wrote: > > Andrew Haley wrote: >> Phil Race wrote: >>> I recall that we refactored the patch to touch fewer of the littlecms >>> internals. This helped since just 4 days after that patch the littlecms >>> version was upgraded from 1.16 to 1.18. I'd be surprised if you have >>> only this patch and not the littlecms 1.18 patch. Maybe its 1.18 >>> rather than this changeset that's the root of the problem. >>> >>> FYI, the code in 6-open and jdk7 should now, I think, be identical. >> >> I don't know where you might have got the idea that I don't have the >> littlecms 1.18 patch; I certainly do! > > > Since you mentioned a changeset which was since completely blown > away by a subsequent one ..
Oh, I see. Perhaps I misread the logs. >> OK, so I'll open a bug for a JCK failure. Is it sufficient simply >> to cite the test and the error message? I have a webrev that I'll >> send as soon as there is a bugzilla entry to attach it to. The bug is at https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100050, with a suggested patch attached to it. Please have a look and let me know if I can push the patch to 6-open and jdk7. If you need webrevs as well as the patch I can provide them. Andrew.
