+1PS. Usually we don't need a new technical review if the back-port is identical to the original fix.
-- best regards, Anthony On 7/15/2014 2:23 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Phil. Looks fine. On 7/14/14 10:19 PM, Phil Race wrote:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8040808.8u/ Identical to the JDK 9 fix : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/a9b0cd14e6e1 -phil.
