Perhaps not. I can’t recall whether it was tested and I doubt that anyone tried to use it. The tag sets we provide by default are pretty comprehensive.
Brian On Aug 4, 2016, at 9:35 AM, Philip Race <philip.r...@oracle.com> wrote: > That would not have worked anyway, would it ? > Class.forName(String) was searching using the bootstrap class loader. > > It presumably also would not have worked when the plugin was > (in the past) loaded as a standard extension either. > > -phil. > > On 8/4/16, 9:01 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> >> That was the original intent of the design way back when, but it is unknown >> as to whether anyone actually availed themselves of this capability. >> >> Brian >> >> On Aug 4, 2016, at 8:37 AM, Sergey Bylokhov <sergey.bylok...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Is it possible that TIFFTagSet will be extended by the user and passed via >>> xml? In this case will we able to load the user's class via forName? >>
