On 6/22/18, 2:15 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:

you are using in java

409             prevRemotePrinters = GetRemotePrintersNames();
431                 String[] currentRemotePrinters = GetRemotePrintersNames();

I am not sure how this compiles any more (the java code) since the native declaration changed
while you are at it, please change
269                 if (info4->Attributes&  0x00000010) {
to
if (info4->Attributes&  PRINTER_ATTRIBUTE_NETWORK) {

  as the hardcoded value might change in future.

Not likely to change .. in fact it would make existing code fail to work, but
good to do it from the point of understanding the code.

-phil.


Regards
Prasanta
On 6/22/2018 2:32 PM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:

Hi Prasanta, Here is the new webrev for that change:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.06/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.06/>

Thanks and regards,

Shashi

*From:*Prasanta Sadhukhan
*Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2018 2:00 PM
*To:* Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah <[email protected]>; Philip Race <[email protected]>; 2d-dev <[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] <Swing Dev> [11] JDK-8153732: Windows remote printer changes do not reflect in lookupPrintServices()

btw,

GetRemotePrintersNames
violates camelcase style. I suggest to usegetRemotePrintersNames


Regards
Prasanta

On 6/22/2018 1:56 PM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:

    Thank you Prasanta for the review.

    Thanks and regards,

    Shashi

    *From:*Prasanta Sadhukhan
    *Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2018 1:42 PM
    *To:* Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
    <[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected]>; Philip Race
    <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>; 2d-dev
    <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] <Swing Dev> [11] JDK-8153732:
    Windows remote printer changes do not reflect in
    lookupPrintServices()

    looks good. One more thing, you could probably use

    if (info4->Attributes&  PRINTER_ATTRIBUTE_NETWORK) {

    instead of hardcoding

    if (info4->Attributes&  0x00000010) {


    Also,

    getAllPrinterNames() shares more than 80% code with your recently 
addedGetRemotePrintersNames(). Probably we could optimise getAllPrinterNames to 
use yours

    by having a parameter(all/remote) but it's upto you.

    Regards

    Prasanta

    On 6/22/2018 12:53 PM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:

        Hi Prasanta, Thank you for the review. Here is the new Webrev:

        http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.05/
        <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.05/>

        For the EnumPrinters case, I think the cReturned is
        sufficient as it is set to zero every time we start.

        Thanks and regards,

        Shashi

        *From:*Prasanta Sadhukhan
        *Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2018 10:41 AM
        *To:* Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
        <[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected]>; Philip Race
        <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>;
        2d-dev <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] <Swing Dev> [11] JDK-8153732:
        Windows remote printer changes do not reflect in
        lookupPrintServices()

        I guess

        if (pollStr.equalsIgnoreCase("true")) {

           70                 pollServices = true;

           71             } else if (pollStr.equalsIgnoreCase("false")) {

           72                 pollServices = false;

           73             }

        can be written as

        if (pollStr.equalsIgnoreCase("false"))

        pollServices = false;

        as it is already defaulted to true.

        78          * for polling PrintServices.  The default is 120.

        I guess default is 240.

        also, EnumPrinters returns bool, which we should check like

        263         if (cReturned>  0&&  enumprintersret !=0 ) {

        Regards

        Prasanta

        On 6/22/2018 10:03 AM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:

            Hi Phil, Thanks for your review.

            I have made your suggested changes and here is the
            updated webrev:

            http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.04/
            <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.04/>

            Need one more review to commit this.

            Note: A network printer can be added via the ‘Add a
            printer’ under the ‘Devices and Printers’ dialog. A
            network printer will have the property ‘Device
            description’ set to ‘Network printer connection’.

            Thanks and regards,

            Shashi

            *From:*Phil Race
            *Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2018 2:16 AM
            *To:* Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
            <[email protected]>
            <mailto:[email protected]>; 2d-dev
            <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Subject:* Re: <Swing Dev> [11] JDK-8153732: Windows
            remote printer changes do not reflect in
            lookupPrintServices()

            I thought you were going to make the refresh time 4 minutes ?
            I don't see that it has to be the same on Windows as it
            was on Unix,
            if you say 4 minutes is a sensible value there .. and 4
            mins will be
            less CPU wake up, so I'd back that (4 mins) ahead of 2
            minutes as the default here.

            You still have missing white space

              432             while(true) {


            With these two changes you have my +1 ..

            BTW the native diff looks MUCH better now - thanks !

            -phil.

            On 06/21/2018 01:33 PM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:

                Hi Phil, Here is the new Webrev for changes you
                suggested.

                http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.03/
                <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.03/>

                Thanks and regards,

                Shashi

                *From:*Phil Race
                *Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2018 1:02 AM
                *To:* Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
                <[email protected]>
                <mailto:[email protected]>;
                2d-dev <[email protected]>
                <mailto:[email protected]>
                *Subject:* Re: <Swing Dev> [11] JDK-8153732: Windows
                remote printer changes do not reflect in
                lookupPrintServices()

                +        private static final long DELAY = 1000 * 60 * 4; // 4 
min pooling

                I think we need a System Property that can control this.

                I suggest the name "sun.java2d.print.minRefreshTime" which is 
what we use on Unix.

                and similarly to there we should have 
"sun.java2d.print.polling" which is a boolean

                and controls whether we do this at all ..

                See 
src/java.desktop/unix/classes/sun/print/PrintServiceLookupProvider.java

                Lots of places where you are missing a space before "("

                +            if(str1.length != str2.length) {

                +                for(int i = 0;i<  str1.length;i++) {

                +                    for(int j = 0;j<  str2.length;j++) {

                +                        if(!str1[i].equals(str2[j])) {

                +            while(true) {

                +                if(doCompare(prevRemotePrinters, 
currentRemotePrinters)) {

                There's some of that in native too

                  266                 if(info4->Attributes&  0x00000010) {

                
Inhttp://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.01/src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/WPrinterJob.cpp.sdiff.html
  
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.01/src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/WPrinterJob.cpp.sdiff.html>

                you seem to have moved all the existing and (I think) unchanged 
related functions so the DIFF appears

                much bigger than it really is. Please move them back and 
re-generate.

                The test really needs to provide an "out" for someone running 
the test who has no way

                to add a network printer .. they don't want to have to fail the 
test.

                As well as that, arguably this should be an @ignore test, so it 
is not run unless

                you are trying to run all the tests.

                -phil.

                On 06/21/2018 12:08 PM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:

                    Hi Phil, Here is the new Webrev. I chose 4 mins
                    because I think it takes around 2 mins to add a
                    new network printer, hence I felt 4 mins is a
                    good time.

                    The windows **PrinterChangeNotifications** calls
                    are a blocking function calls hence I could not
                    add the remote printers monitor to the existing
                    thread. Hence there is a new thread being added
                    to listen to remote printers status changes.

                    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.01/
                    
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.01/>

                    Thanks and regards,

                    Shashi

                    *From:*Philip Race
                    *Sent:* Thursday, June 21, 2018 5:38 AM
                    *To:* 2d-dev <[email protected]>
                    <mailto:[email protected]>; Shashidhara
                    Veerabhadraiah
                    <[email protected]>
                    <mailto:[email protected]>
                    *Subject:* Fwd: Re: <Swing Dev> [11] JDK-8153732:
                    Windows remote printer changes do not reflect in
                    lookupPrintServices()

                    The main concern I have is we now have a busy
                    thread burning CPU ..
                    bad for laptops .. and if we add a delay we have
                    less prompt notification
                    of a new local printer.

                    I think the compromise is that the existing
                    thread maybe kept as is,
                    and we add a new thread that pools every 10
                    minutes for a remote printer.

                    If we can make the existing thread wake up from
                    its wait and do that, even better.

                    -phil.

                    -------- Original Message --------

                    *Subject: *

                        

                    Re: [11] JDK-8153732: Windows remote printer
                    changes do not reflect in lookupPrintServices()

                    *Date: *

                        

                    Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:03:56 -0700

                    *From: *

                        

                    Philip Race <[email protected]>
                    <mailto:[email protected]>

                    *Organization: *

                        

                    Oracle Corporation

                    *To: *

                        

                    Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
                    <[email protected]>
                    <mailto:[email protected]>

                    *CC: *

                        

                    [email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>,
                    [email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>



                    This is on the wrong lists. Not Swing. Not AWT.
                    Should be 2d.
                    I'll forward it there and continue there.
                    Consider the AWT+Swing threads dead.

                    -phil.

                    On 6/20/18, 3:12 AM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
                    wrote:

                        Hi All, Please review this code changes for
                        the below enhancement.

                        Enhancement:
                        https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153732

                        Webrev:
                        
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.00/
                        
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.00/>

                        Details of the changes: Windows provides
                        *PrinterChangeNotification* functions that
                        provides information about printer status
                        changes of the local printers(subset) but not
                        network printers.
                        Alternatively, Windows provides a way thro'
                        which one can get the network printer status
                        changes by using WMI, RegistryKeyChange
                        combination, which is a slightly complex
                        mechanism.
                        The Windows WMI offers an async and sync
                        method to read thro' registry via the WQL
                        query. The async method is considered
                        dangerous as it leaves open a channel until
                        we close it. But the async method has the
                        advantage of being notified of a change in
                        registry by calling callback without polling
                        for it. The sync method uses the polling
                        mechanism to notify.
                        RegistryValueChange cannot be used in
                        combination with WMI to get registry value
                        change notification because of an error that
                        may be generated because the scope of the
                        query would be too big to handle(at times).
                        Hence an alternative mechanism is choosen via
                        the EnumPrinters by polling for the count of
                        printer status changes(add\remove) and based
                        on it update the printers list(both local and
                        remote printers - superset).

                        Thanks and regards,

                        Shashi


Reply via email to