On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:05:54 GMT, Erik Joelsson <er...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> My understanding of JEPs is that they should be viewed as living documents.
>> In this case, I think it's perfectly valid to update JEP 201 with additional
>> source code layout. Both for this and for the other missing dirs.
>
> Regarding the chosen layout. Did you consider following the existing pattern
> of src/<module>/{share,<OS>}/data?
@erikj79 Good point, that makes much more sense.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1611
