On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:19:05 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <i...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Is there a plan to move make/jdk/src/classes/build/tools/intpoly into 
>> java.base as well?
>> 
>> Update: I see all subdirs in tools are still there.
>
> @wangweij Moving build tools is a related, but separate, question, which is 
> addressed by https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241463.
> 
> I send out a review earlier this year (see 
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2020-March/027038.html), 
> but there were differing opinions on what the proper placement of these tools 
> should be, and the discussion kind of fizzled out without reaching a 
> conclusion.

@magicus @erikj79 it's now clearly stated that you want everything under `make` 
owned by the build team, which is fair.  You are right that `make` has been 
easily considered as a dumping ground and it's time to define a clean structure.

I reviewed this patch and this looks okay to me.   Some follow-up questions and 
follow-on cleanup for example "should jdwp.spec belong to `specs` directory vs 
`data`?  There are platform-specific data (such as charsets) which has been 
special-case in the makefile and they need follow-on clean up.   I agree that 
this should be cleaned up by the component teams and not part of this PR.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1611

Reply via email to