On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:22:27 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I think, a generic name is OK as the path of shader file already has both >> awt (libawt_lwawt) and java2d in it. > > In the source tree, yes, but not in the jdk image where it ends up in > `$JAVA_HOME/lib/shaders.metallib`. I don't have a problem with this, as long > as it is a deliberate decision. OK. I get your point. Keeping the name unchanged for now as there won't be another .metallib in JDK. The name can be changed in the future if need arises. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2403
