On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:33:50 GMT, Andrew Haley <a...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Marked as reviewed by luhenry (Author). > >> > > > [ Back-porting this patch to JDK 11] depends on the will of openjdk11 >> > > > maintainers to accept this (and few other, like jep-388, as we depend >> > > > on it) contribution. >> > > >> > > >> > > To the extent that 11u has fixed policies :) we definitely have a policy >> > > of accepting patches to keep 11u working on current hardware. So yes. >> > >> > >> > @lewurm That sounds like a green flag for you and jep-388 (with its >> > R18_RESERVED functionality) ;) >> >> Thanks, @theRealAph, and @VladimirKempik . We are on it! > > It's going to be tricky to do in a really clean way, given some of the > weirdnesses of the ABI. However, I think there's probably a need for it The JEP was targeted to JDK17. So I propose to integrate this. Thank you all for the reviews, suggestions, discussions, and support! ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2200
