On Thu, 27 May 2021 16:38:02 GMT, Alexander Zuev <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Is this requirement is so important? can we return an MRI(same as on
>> Windows) which will have just one resolution? Otherwise what the user should
>> do if the requested size was 32x32 but returned image will be 21x21? Paint
>> the small icon or rescale it by the application?
>
>> Is this requirement is so important? can we return an MRI(same as on
>> Windows) which will have just one resolution?
>
> We might - when the implementation will be done on other platforms. Probably
> it will be done by me, probably - by someone else. Right now we return
> whatever we have so on Linux it is UIManager default icons for file or a
> folder (which is exactly what any file manager on Linux shows for any file
> and this is exactly what we promised in the method description). In the
> future it can change but for now it is all we can guarantee.
This is my point I think we should update this implementation to always return
MRI of the requested size, otherwise, the code example of this will look like
this:
Icon icon = fsv.getSystemIcon(file, width, height);
if (icon.getIconWidth() != width && icon.getIconHeight() != height) {
return scaleTheIconInTheSameWayAsBeforeTheFix(icon, width, height);
} else if (icon instanceof ImageIcon) {
ImageIcon imageIcon = (ImageIcon) icon;
if (icon.getImage() instanceof MultiResolutionImage) {
MultiResolutionImage mri = (MultiResolutionImage) icon.getImage();
return mri.getResolutionVariant(width, height);
} else {
return imageIcon;
}
} else {
return icon;
}
I pretty sure we can do better than the code above.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2875
