Re:
If music did have morals, then techno has promoted more drug use, sex and
smoking than any other form of music
First....that's a faulty argument. If you're going to use a "If...then"
statement then your equality is wrong. The way you stated your argument
doesn't make sense. The correct way of stating it would have been: "If music
did have morals, then techno HAS NOT promoted more drug use...."
Why?
Because techno is music, and if music DID HAVE morals, and drugs, sex and
smoking are moraless activities (which I'm lead you are arguing) then techno
WOULD NOT promote these activities...
See?
Second point:
"techno has promoted more drug use, sex and smoking than any other form of
music (and yes I'm including all the music in the 60's, we are the children
of the baby boomers therefore there are more of us, way more)"
If you are really going to be taken seriously you should present some
numbers and references backing your statements otherwise people will think
you're a chump spouting off at the mouth. Which you're not but people might
think you are.
Three: I'm really taking the piss
Cheers
Fred
(and yes I'm including all the music in the 60's, we are the children of the
baby boomers therefore there are more of us, way more). But that is a
insipid argument that I don't care to give anymore thought to.
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
