Well, @ Andrew: this is NOT regarding a specific situation. I am curious as to the thoughts, feelings of others on this subject...just opening up a discussion since there are a bunch of us artist types on this list...I felt like since we were going retro on the 313 list this week, I'd bring up a 'would you rather' type of question...just to add to all of our activity:)
@Joe: Well put. @ Jason: Well said as well...I tend to agree with this sentiment...however, I feel like there are times that change can be good since many of us as artists tend to isolate rather than explore. On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Jason Kenjar <jasonk1...@gmail.com> wrote: > im a FIRM believer that the artist primary concer is to > satisfy themselves. if others like it great! if not then they be damned. > > of course this kind thinking is not for marketing purposes. > > On Sep 3, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Kevin Kennedy <the...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Should an artist, working with a label (who may or may not pay them) >> revise a tune that they (the artist) consider a 'complete' work? And >> if so, how far _should_ an artist compromise in order to satisfy the >> desires of a label? >> >> Curious to see your answers 313ers! >> >> >> -- >> fbk >> >> sleepengineering/absoloop US > -- fbk sleepengineering/absoloop US
