I respect BMG either way for realizing that Napster and other file sharing technologies are going to stick around (legal or not) and working to find a way to incorporate it into a business model. I think if all the major labels would see this like BMG, and worked together to create a subscription service, it would be worth it to still be a member for most of the mainstream music community. Even if the service was $20 a month, it would still be worth it for most people, considering the amount of music that would be available, and would serve the artists and napster well.
That said, I would equally hate to see the Napster model drown in corporate poo poo. I guess I'm hoping it's determined that listers have a right to file sharing; that way Napster can decide what's best for the service. GYS set.go.recordings www.mp3.com/gys
