the most ridiculous things about these rules are those having to do with
restrictions concerning the number of times you play a certain artist, or
label, or songs from an album.

I came across this issue several times, especially when I would do
artists/producer features, label retrospectives and the such.

mad wax | the vocode project | http://www.vocode.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeffrey Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: [313] Internet Monopoly


> At 03:28 PM 5/23/2001, Ian wrote:
> >on 5/23/01 3:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > and now we are being urged to pay fees to
> > > broadcast on the net. What is that? I can understand of you are making
> > money
> > > off of your webcast but most of us do this simply to promote quality
> > > underground music.
> >
> >Interesting angle here.  You could try to counter that fees should be
waived
> >due to the fact that you are not billing *them* standard fees for
promotion
> >of the recordnings.
> >
> >Then again, I have no direct experience with the law in this regard.
>
> jwz, one of the guys who wrote netscape, made a ton of money and is
opening
> a club.  on his site for the club, he outlines the hows and whys of all
the
> licensing needed to legally operate an audio webcast:
>
> http://www.dnalounge.com/backstage/webcasting.html
>
> Interesting quote:
> >So, when you want to perform music, you pay all three of these
> >organizations. Rather than asking you which particular songs you're
> >playing, they just charge you a blanket rate for access to their entire
> >catalog; and then they make their own decision on how much of your money
> >to pass along to the various copyright holders. They do this
> >statistically, by looking at the popular music charts: rather than paying
> >the particular artists you've played, they just assume that almost all of
> >your money should go to the most popular stars.
> >
> >And yes, you have to pay all three of them. Though they each represent
> >disjoint sets of artists, they each represent a very large number of
> >artists: so many that they just assume that you're playing something by
> >someone they represent. So if you're not paying them, then they will sue
you.
>
>
> -j
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to