Ken my man, don't put yourself down too much mate, I think what you do is cool, 
remember its not all about technical abilities as if were all honest we all 
train wreck and do silly things so even we are not a patch on the Mills & Mays 
etc , (but then maybe if they were reading this they may send an email simliar 
to mine ........if there honest John  :)

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Odeluga, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Sent: Thu 20/11/2003 12:18 
        To: Robert Taylor; Gary Robinson; Martin; Jason Brunton; Blackman, Ryan 
(UKEKT) 
        Cc: 313 
        Subject: RE: (313) A&H Xone 32 (was richie hawtin in Wired)
        
        

        Well, any number of people will tell you it wasn't djing! ;-)
        
        I was told it was enjoybale in any case, so I'm not bothered. Just 
trying to
        differentiate myself from the folks whose life seems to depend to a 
large
        extent on djing - you know, the Ians, Tristans, Nicks etc. I'm not a 
patch
        on that breed of cat!
        
        >-----Original Message-----
        >From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:06 PM
        >To: Odeluga, Ken; Gary Robinson; Martin; Jason Brunton; Blackman, Ryan
        >(UKEKT)
        >Cc: 313
        >Subject: RE: (313) A&H Xone 32 (was richie hawtin in Wired)
        >
        >
        >If you're not a DJ, what was that thing you were doing in Public
        >Life on Saturday?
        >
        >;-)
        >
        >-----Original Message-----
        >From: Odeluga, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:04 PM
        >To: Gary Robinson; Martin; Jason Brunton; Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)
        >Cc: 313
        >Subject: (313) A&H Xone 32 (was richie hawtin in Wired)
        >
        >
        >I'm not convinced - although what do I know, not being a dj?
        >
        >###################################################################
        >##################
        >Note:
        >
        >Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not
        >necessarily represent
        >those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically
        >stated. This email
        >and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for
        >the use of the
        >individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have
        >received this email in
        >error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >
        >Thank You.
        >###################################################################
        >##################
        >
        >
        

Reply via email to