first, i wanted to write that they increased the levels of the tracks. but then i made a 1:1 comparison and noticed that this is not the case. a few tracks seem to have some adjustments on the mids, very subtle tho.
strangewise, the remastered m-series compilation is more different to the old one. whatsoever, i wouldn't have heard the bc tracks as much lately if there wouldn't have the re-issue. that already justifies its existence :) cheers, ronny > ronny, how do the remastered versions of BC sound compared to the > originals? What has been changed? gained or lost (in your opinion). > maybe a good thing to write this list about- > > -jasonk > > > On Wednesday, January 28, 2004, at 07:09 AM, Ronny Pries wrote: > > > one of these minimal days here... > > > > Basic Channel Compilation (Remastered) > > Monolake Gravity > > > > Cheers, > > Ronny > > >
