Oh no, I've got to stop doing that, it's really embarrassing. I think I get it 
from my Mum, who BTW is the living embodiment of 313 in case anyone was 
wondering about the relevance of this email...


You wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> mmmmm yep ;)
> 
> 
>                                                                               
>                                             
>                       "Dan Bean"                                              
>                                             
>                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
>                               
>                       o.uk>                    cc:       313@hyperreal.org    
>                                             
>                                                Subject:  Re: Re: Re: (313) 
> Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe story of   
>                       03/04/04 09:35 AM         the    Original Hot Mix 5)    
>                                             
>                                                                               
>                                             
>                                                                               
>                                             
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Not totally following you there, since 'entertaining', 'perplexing' and
> 'deviant' are all words that I would use 'funny' as an alternative to.
> Could you explain what you mean a bit, or am I taking a joke to literally
> (again)? :)
> 
> You wrote:
> >
> 
> > >>It is funny, but then they probably laugh at us for being a bunch of
> > definition obsessed trainspotters.
> >
> > I wouldn't exactly say that we are definition obsessed - more like a
> > slightly unhealthy preoccupation with objects and figures that nobody e=
> > lse
> > really cares for.
> > And, I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you about you finding it
> > "funny". Entertaining maybe - perplexing possibly - deviant most likely=
> >  -
> > but "funny" it is not.
> >
> > just my 2=A2
> >
> > MEK=
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to