perhaps you should not say "when I played to a crowd", and you should instead say "when played to a crowd of ____ it was accepted openly".
I can see the line that they don't want to cross. If they allowed reviews like that, they'd have every bedroom dj in teh world sliding in quips about how good a record is when THEY play it, etc. If it's really not about the fact that you played it, then you'll have no problem changing the words around to make it generic. :D dense On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote: > i submitted a couple reviews to discogs.com yesterday (they > finally got their sh*t together enough to send me my password > after having not been able to log in for a year because their lost > password thing didnt work). i got one back that was rejected on > the grounds of "self-hype"??!?!?! here was the review: > > "Divination" is UFO!'s second greatest moment (only to "Enemy > Infiltration". I played this tune for an experimental/breakcore > audience and even they could get into the absolutely nuts synths. > The squeals drive the dancefloor crazy! > > what are these guys smoking? where is the self hype here? (i even > use an alias on there that has nothing to do with my deejaying or > anything else. how can i hype myself if no one knows who i am?) > oddly enough, another one of my comments where i refer to a record > not leaving my box for 2 years is about to get passed, because > that apparently isnt self hype. i want to add more records reviews > because i love the site and theres plenty of tunes that deserve > comment that have none, but if theyre suddenly going to become > asinine, its not going to be worth it for me. > > tom > > ________________________________________________________________ > andythepooh.com > > > > >
