:0) -----Original Message----- From: Scotto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 August 2004 20:31 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) RE: do not hate on discogs
i'd be a millionare if i got off my ass and made the "sarcastic font" that i have alway wanted/needed. (read this in a sarcastic tone for propper effect) scotto ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ken Odeluga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Robert Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "jason kenjar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 6:44 AM Subject: RE: (313) RE: do not hate on discogs > hang on hang on hang on Ken and evryone, woooo there :).... > > I for one get hounded for my emails that I send to my friends, the reason is that when I write my emails as we all do, I tend to speak it out in my head as I would if I was speaking to them in person but email never ever conveys this and so everyone reads the email in their own style. So a sacarstic email unless read in a sacarstic manner will be read in the manner of the person at that time ,same with a serious email, sometimes if I am in a comical mood I can mis-read them... > > this sadly is a problem on emails, it will never go away so lets be too jumpy,surley there are other things to worry about :) > > your humbly > Ian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ken Odeluga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tue 10/08/2004 09:38 > To: Robert Taylor; jason kenjar > Cc: 313@hyperreal.org > Subject: RE: (313) RE: do not hate on discogs > > > > How about doing us all a favour Robert and pressing 'delete' before you send > your ill-considered rude and sarcastic comments in the first place? Doesn't > that apeal to your superior logical consistency which you are so determined > to exercise on the foibles of er, an > > ***internet eamil list about techno music!*** > > How erudite! > > The professorship is coming! > > In person you are such a nice bloke. But on line ytou ain't half a twat, I > can tell you. > > Good day, > > Ken > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 10:28 AM > >To: jason kenjar > >Cc: 313@hyperreal.org > >Subject: (313) RE: do not hate on discogs > > > > > >Excuse me for making another flippant comment which got taken way > >too seriously - I only meant it was sh!t in as far as inputting > >info and corrrecting misinformation - it's obviously a great resource. > >No need to attack me personally - if you don't like my style, press delete > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: jason kenjar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 8:20 PM > >To: Robert Taylor > >Cc: 313@hyperreal.org > >Subject: do not hate on discogs > > > > > >Pardon me "Mr. taylor", but I dont see how somebody who spams the list > >daily with one or two quick sentences of over-simplified arrogant > >generalizations has the guts to call the discogs website "sh!t". Im > >just one of the many free users and am not affiliated with the site by > >any other means, but I still have to stand up for them if you feel it > >necissary to besmirch their name. > > > >Discogs has been very helpful to me in the past. I can only recollect > >a fraction of the many times I have found discogs to be totally > >helpful. Knowledge is power, and there is a lot you can learn if your > >are willing to spend some time researching discogs. its also totally > >free, you dont even have to be a member to search its information > >libraries. > > > >And is it so unthinkable and unforgivable that there would be spotty > >information about Basic Channel? I consider myself a fairly well > >informed member of the under ground community, and even i think all the > >basic channel records look alike. Artists like von oswald arent about > >advertising themselves nearly as much as you do for yourself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On Monday, August 9, 2004, at 09:36 AM, Robert Taylor wrote: > > > >> Discogs is sh!t and there's loads of inaccuracies. > > > >################################################################### > >################## > >Note: > > > >Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not > >necessarily represent > >those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically > >stated. This email > >and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for > >the use of the > >individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have > >received this email in > >error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Thank You. > >################################################################### > >################## > > > > > > > > > > > --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.733 / Virus Database: 487 - Release Date: 02/08/04 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.733 / Virus Database: 487 - Release Date: 02/08/04
