Well to be honest, I would never have thought of Mad Mike had he not been in
the track title, just like the tune. As for not taking to Ian O'Brien!! Man,
Im shocked! Gigantic days??
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Brunton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stewart Caig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: (313) new record observations
Aaaaaargh- that's probably the main reason I've never really taken to
Ian's stuff- I really see that track as being "Mad Mike Lite" :)
Jason
On 2 Mar 2005, at 22:43, Stewart Caig wrote:
Mad Mike meets Ian O'Brien, thats what I want to see! Or failing that
just Mad Mike doing 'Ian O'Brien disease'.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Brunton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt MacQueen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: (313) new record observations
I'd back that opinion up- I've lost count of how many tracks I've heard
now that SHOULD work on paper (Fat Freddie's Drop meets Recloose, Joey
Beltram meets Juan Atkins, errr, 808 State meets UB40- maybe not!) but
just don't quite jell when you hear the tune
cheers
