Werd. I grew up the rather anglophile S-W Ontario, and I *never* got over the whole "smoke a fag" thing. Of course, I don't think of the violent "smoking", but the that'll-cost-you-$20 kind of "smoking" =]

Anyway, this topic has been discussed to death, so I'll keep it short(-ish). When I used to hit a lot of parties in Chicago and Indy in the late 90's, booty was always a sure way to flood the floor with girls and queer kids. The same when I moved back to T.O. for the early 2K's. My most enduring memories of booty are of me and a girl-buddy of mine taking turns grinding on each other.

As one of the above-mentioned queer kids, I'm included in 50% of the invective of booty (and, depending on how you read "b!tch", I might qualify for the other 50% as well). I'm well aware of it, and it contributes to the absurd excess of "masculinity" that I find so hilarious in booty. If there's anything that I find disturbing about booty, it's actually how it re-presents black (heterosexual) male sexuality/identity... Anyway, my point is that the way people understand booty isn't as simple as ironic/sincere or good/bad.

pomohomo,
Luis

On Apr 28, 2005, at 10:28 AM, Stoddard, Kamal wrote:

Not as weird as "smoking fags" NOT being considered an outrageously violent act of aggression. :)


Kamal K. Stoddard
Turner Broadcasting Systems





-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 11:15 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Quest for da Booty


Man I think y'all are overthinking this because of the
cultural divide.
It's just ghetto shxt man.

oh yeah.

I forgot to add.

culture difference or not, I think Y'ALL weird.

bwahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

*evil laugh*

Reply via email to