haven't heard the rng album, but the non-techno tracks on the theory of everything would seem to me like an indication of them trying to find a bigger audience. but, as far as i can remember, the r 'n b tracks were of the bland variety.
----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, November 24, 2005 12:18 pm Subject: Re: (313) RNG album > well, not on itself I enjoy the fact if an artist takes some risk. > it still will be in the result, in the music, if it is any good, > the risk is > well taken. > > it's quite obvious with Octave One and RNG, they try to move on, > which is a good thing - but until now I think the results are > rather > dissapointing. > > Of both albums some tracks are really brilliant, and on the other > hand some > pretty dull. > > all a matter of opinion. > > any others? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Martin Dust" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "313" <313@hyperreal.org> > Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 1:05 PM > Subject: Re: (313) RNG album > > > > Thought it was pretty good and I enjoyed the fact they took some > risks > > rather than just repeating the past... > > > > > > On 24 Nov 2005, at 12:00, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> ok, what do people think about the Random Noise Generation album? > >> > >> for me, I really dig the techno tracks, real, deep and subtile > Burden > >> Brothers style > >> > >> but I don't really understand all the other tracks.. > >> > >> ? > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Beattie" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> To: <313@hyperreal.org> > >> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 12:49 PM > >> Subject: (313) Holiday > >> > >> > >>> no, not another Madonna thread ;-) > >>> Just a quick one to say happy thanksgiving to our US > >>> friends > >>> Cheers > >>> BT > >
