I remember the times when electronic music was not as splintered up as it is
now. I really love the music, but I just can't keep up with all the new
variants of all the styles. In the 'early days' you had house music and
everybody got along (Watch it I may be generalising a bit here). In the
clubs I went to the night started of with some trancy stuff (good though)
and peaked with some heavy shit techno and early rave stuff (the Belgian
stuff from around '91-'92-'93). Now I'm all clubed out. I practically don't
go to clubs anymore because it's all the same shit. The only decent club
around: Fuse in Brussels, can't even hold my attention. I rather like to go
to parties in dark, industrial places and stuff like that. Does anybody have
the same feeling? I guess in England you guys must be going nuts with all
these crap superclubs...


John

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2000 5:23 PM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (313) DJs DJs DJs! :)


I completely agree with what's being said here. I'm
only 19. Only got my own decks last November
(previously I used a friend's) but I've always loved
music. I used to like jungle but I've always moved
around styles. Basically, I look for styles that
haven't been adulterated by the mainstream. I've been
from hardcore when I was 13 through jsut about every
dance genre. I'm sticking to detroit now though. All
the things I like about music are the essence of
detroit. It creates an atmosphere unlike that of any
other music I have come across... 

It seems mainstream music today is like processed
food. Sh*t goes in, sh*t comes out but it's all nicely
packaged so the kids buy it. When my parents were
kids, they could go into the record shop and pick up
something from the top forty and it'd be a good tune.
Number one in the chart was worthy of that position.
In forty years time, I won't be remembering Brittany
Spears. Westlife and nostalgia will not be in used
together in the same sentence.

Now trance is what the kids buy around here, but these
kids do it for fame and friends and 'cause it's cool.
Ask 'em it's origins they won't have a clue. I don't
think going out and buying all the top tunes is the
way to go if you want to be successful or if you love
music or if you want to be taken seriously.

As far as I'm concerned, I didn't start djing because
I wanted to be popular. In fact the prospect of djing
in a club had me sh*tting bricks. I love music though,
I wanted to produce my own tunes but equipment was
costly and decks seemed cheaper at the time(though
making use of them seems more costly long run). Music
has always been my love, I don't buy records because
everyone else buys them. Hey... this leads straight
back to my Jeff Mills argument;) 

I think these mainstream dj's need to be shown up for
what they are. Overpaid, selfcentered morons with no
skill and no taste... A big club needs to start
bringing in the skilled dj's and those that can really
create a vibe. Do it when it's full of journalists,
see what they have to say about it... 


Maybe having so many wannabe dj's IS a good thing
though. In the end, only the best will survive.
Survival of the fittest...

Dj Pacific:)

--- Andrew Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> personally, i see it like this: there are
> those who dj because they love the music
> and want to share it. some have the skills,
> some don't but are trying. in the end, they're
> sharing the love for the music. then there
> are others who buy into the "dj as rock star"
> culture and get into DJing, not because they
> want to share their love for the music, but
> for a variety of *other* reasons. yes, we always
> need new djs coming up, but we also have
> to have new djs coming up that are djing
> for the right reasons. i can remember back
> in 1987 when the dj was the last thing anyone
> would want to be; you were lower than
> the bartender and had drunks screaming at
> ya for this and that; could get beaten up
> for playing a song people didn't like; there
> were no flyers with your name in big letters,
> etc, etc, etc; nowadays, though, with
> the way "dj culture" has grown, kids don't
> know about the history of the dj, haven't
> worked their way up and gained experience
> via weddings, parties for friends, school,
> radio, etc, etc. they go out, buy two technics
> 1200s and a mixer, buy the top records
> they see in the mags, hook up with a
> promoter friend, get a booking, and suddenly
> they're a "DJ!" now i'm not saying all new djs
> are like that (thankfully, there are always some
> new people to the scene who have love in their
> hearts for the
> music), but i've personally seen it happen more
> and more frequently, and i'm sure many would
> agree. check the interviews with terrence
> parker, alan oldham, john acquaviva, and others
> who've *paid their dues* to be where they are
> in today's dj scene (cognition:
> http://techno.ca/cognition)
> and there's a commentary about this on the same
> site. yes, we need new djs, but it would be best
> for them to take it a bit slower, not suddenly
> get obsessed with this "be a DJ! be a DJ!" thing.
> personally, i've seen at least 3 or 4 young kids
> here in
> halifax spend tons of $ on tables, mixer and
> records,
> and then a couple of months later they've sold
> it all and are very disillusioned. though i don't
> know what all of the reasons are for them
> (personally
> ie for each of them), i *do* know from observation
> that they get a gig via a promoter friend and then
> you never see them booked again. why? well, a)
> there are so many kids desperate to "be a dj!!!"
> and, at least here in halifax, they're almost
> beating
> each other up and crawling over each other to
> get gigs, and b) they just haven't laid the proper
> foundation; they think that if they buy the gear
> and the records, they are almost *owed* gigs
> now, as if that's all there is to it. (an i've had
> most of these kids on my local radio show to
> try and help them out, see what they're up to,
> etc, but, though some are skilled, the majority
> are just jumping into the "DJ DJ DJ" thing too
> soon; they haven't practiced, have to write
> their set down on a piece of paper, have
> everything planned to the max, etc, etc
> ie the urge to "be a dj" has thrown them
> into it, er, they're thrown themselves into
> it, so fast and so *too early* that they're
> just *not ready*; some of them go on
> to get gigs and skills, but most you never
> hear from again; if they took the time to
> set the stage, they might be still doing it,
> but rushing into it thinking they'll be stars
> the day after tomorrow, hurts their self
> esteem and wastes their $ and effort) but talk to
> parker, oldham, acquaviva et al and these
> guys (there's girls too, of course) spent many
> many nights practicing at home, doing radio,
> playing for small parties, etc, etc; they didn't
> just suddenly become big dj names that
> people know, it took years to get where they
> are. but the kids staring out (againn, not *all*
> of them, but many) don't understand that it's
> not like you wake up one day with the $
> to buy the gear and the next day you'll be
> on flyers every week. ok, enough rant from
> me. AND it wasn't Beck who sang "two turntables
> and a microphone", that was a sample from
> Mantronix' "Needle To The Groove"!
> np terrence dixon--from the far future (dm tresor)
> it's out later this month and damn awesome. i'll
> have it online in full in RA soon.
>
>
> Cognition/Andrew Duke's In The Mix
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://techno.ca/cognition
> 1096 Queen St #123 Halifax NS Canada B3H 2R9

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

Reply via email to