On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 08:17 +0200, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
> <signaturebeforequotedtext></signaturebeforequotedtext>
> On 28.09.17 00:49, William Brown  <wibr...@redhat.com> wrote: 
> > 
> > On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 14:30 +0200, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
> > > my build on OpenIndiana with the IllumOS provided NSPR cores on startup 
> > > of some commands:
> > > 
> > > $ pwdhash 
> > > Assertion failure: 0 == lock->notified.length, at 
> > > /jenkins/jobs/oi-userland/workspace/components/library/mozilla-nspr/nspr-4.12/nspr/pr/src/pthreads/ptsynch.c:159
> > > /usr/bin/pwdhash: line 60: 5993: Abort(coredump)
> > > 
> > > $ pstack core
> > > core 'core' of 5993: /usr/bin/amd64/pwdhash-bin
> > > fffffd7fff2b4eda _lwp_kill () + a
> > > fffffd7fff2480e0 raise (6) + 20
> > > fffffd7fff220818 abort () + 98
> > > fffffd7ff943fda2 ???????? ()
> > > fffffd7ff9457828 PR_DestroyLock () + d8
> > > fffffd7ff978bc2a slapi_entry_free () + 11a
> > > 0000000000402888 init_config () + 2d8
> > > 0000000000402d43 main () + 353
> > > 000000000040235c _start () + 6c
> > > 
> > > Before I dive in the source code, has anyone a hint where I can start to 
> > > search what happens here?
> > > <signaturebeforequotedtext></signaturebeforequotedtext><signatureafterquotedtext></signatureafterquotedtext>
> > 
> > Sounds like the lock may not have been created properly? Sadly I think
> > you need to dive into the source,
> > 
> > :( 
> > 
> > Let me know if you need any other advice. 
> > 
> It works, if I compile with 
> 
>  AC_DEFINE([USE_POSIX_RWLOCKS], [1], [POSIX rwlocks])
> 
> Because this is also set in Linux, I guess the NSPR Threads is not tested 
> anymore.

Yes, we only use pthreads, and we are likely to drop NSPR locks too.
NSPR is probably going to be only used for NSS/socket interactions going
forward because it adds overheads for no gains.

As a curious question, does solaris have rustlang support .... ? 

-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to